
|
Marketing Plan COST-EFFECTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Economic Activity for the Reuse Industry | |
| Establishments | 26,716 |
| Employment | 169,183 |
| Annual Payroll | $2,747,498,000 |
| Estimated Revenue | $14,182,531,000 |
Source: National Recycling Coalition Report, Executive Summary, p. ES-2 (Beck, 2001)
Source reduction (avoiding the production of waste) has been widely embraced in many industrial and commercial sectors, as a result of redesigning industrial processes and products, to increase energy efficiency, and significantly reduce water consumption and toxics generation, and to provide for cost savings. However, a continuing problem exists in that materials and products viewed as no longer being useful may be discarded because the present owner does not know how to find the next user in the value chain. Hence, the development of "Materials Exchanges" has evolved, as a means of transferring "usable" materials and products to the next user. Most of the Exchanges in New England and New York have an online component, designed to link manufacturers, offices, commercial enterprises, non-profit organizations, schools and other public agencies, and government procurement programs. Thus, the holder of discontinued or outdated products, office furniture, or used electronics, now has a mechanism for finding potential users of these items. Goals of Materials Exchanges may include the following:OVERVIEW OF NEW ENGLAND AND NEW YORK MATERIALS EXCHANGES
In the Northeast, Materials Exchanges began to appear in 1993, and are characterized by strong cooperation and mutual support. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency New England Regional Office has actively sponsored networking opportunities for the Exchange managers to meet and share information, ideas, and opportunities. This spirit of collaboration, instead of competition, has enabled these programs to grow quickly by learning from the successes and mistakes of their counterparts. Countrywide, a 1999 survey of 165 Materials Exchanges (16% response rate) indicated that the average Exchange services 11,167 individuals and organizations each year, with an average of 230 transactions per month, and accounts for the recycling of nearly 82,500 tons of materials and products a year. About half of the respondents report a free service, some require memberships, and some charge transaction fees or registration/listing fees. Post-consumer products most often exchanged for reuse include office equipment, building materials, appliances, electronics and art supplies, along with paint, domestic furnishings, antiques, and house wares. (Study conducted by the National Recycling Coalition, the Reuse Development Organization, and Princeton University's Center for Energy and Environment Studies, in June 1999; summarized by Christine Beling, an environmental engineer in the USEPA Region I, in an article in Resource Recycling Magazine, November 2000).
The New England and New York Materials Exchanges differ in many ways, including size, scope, focus, funding, management, location, and history. Fact sheets on each of the New England and New York Exchanges and a detailed comparison of the Exchanges is located in Appendix I and II of this report. However, many common features also characterize the Exchanges. Most of them have an online component, and the Web addresses are listed in Appendix II. Most of the state-sponsored Exchanges are broad-based, including a variety of material categories. Many of the non-governmental organization (NGO) sponsored Exchanges feature a limited variety of products, and are aimed at a targeted audience (e.g. school supplies, arts materials, electronics, etc.). The level of management and oversight varies widely, from self-sufficient, somewhat passive Exchanges where users exchange email contacts, to staffed programs that actively attempt to match users with products to users needing the products.
Procedures utilized by the Exchanges also vary widely, for example, some Exchanges require that all materials offered on the site must be available at no cost to the next user, at least for the initial interaction. Others allow for agreed upon payments to be arranged. Some Exchanges warehouse an inventory, and act as a "middle-man" for the products, but most of them simply try to match the product to the users. Some of the Exchanges maintain a separate website for homeowners and individual users to exchange, and in other cases the Exchanges commingle all users. Exchanges can be categorized as "passive" (publicize listings but are not usually actively involved with exchange details), "active" (act as brokers between the exchanging parties, often charging a fee for services), or "warehouse" (actually taking possession of materials at some point of the transaction). Passive Exchanges are easier to manage, but have little tracking capabilities; active Exchanges necessitate more staff and funding, but can act as catalysts in the exchange process; and warehousing Exchanges have the capability to enhance the effectiveness of Exchange networks, but add considerably to operational costs. As noted in a Rutgers University report on Materials Exchanges, transaction costs (expenditures of resources, time, and effort to complete transactions) often hinder the development of viable markets in recycling and reuse (Andrews, 2000).
Funding for staffing, web-hosting, site-design, and other costs also varies from one Exchange to another; some have almost no funding, beyond the initial startup costs; others have an ongoing source of support (i.e., state agencies, a fee-based system, or in some cases time-limited grant support).
Still, a common challenge facing almost all the Exchanges is how to attract more users, how to make businesses and nonprofits aware of their existence, and how to make their services better known. Thus, in this report, we have attempted to proffer some cost-effective ideas for better marketing the Exchanges. It is understood that given the diversity of the Exchanges, different techniques may be differentially applicable in one case or another.
DEVELOPING A MARKETING STRATEGY
In business settings, it is customary in marketing research to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the business, then to identify the potential opportunities in the marketplace, and finally to note any threats facing the expansion of the business (the SWOT analysis). In the context of this report, the analysis sequence has been modified. We have already described the inherent benefits associated with the Materials Exchanges. The report will go on to explore some of the liabilities associated with the Materials Exchanges, and identify some of the competitors. Then the barriers to expansion will be examined, and the bulk of the report will address the opportunities. Another clarification should be made between Market Research and Marketing Research (i.e., both terms widely used in the business literature). Market Research usually focuses on "looking at a particular market" (its size, structure, product substitutes, barriers to entry, and the allocation of market segments among competitors). Conversely, Marketing Research, "covers broader concepts and refers to an ongoing and systematic collection, interpretation, and reporting of data-data that is used by marketers to deal with specific problems, evaluate the success or failure of a project, or to discover and take advantage of new opportunities" (Nonprofits.org, 2005). This Marketing Plan Report falls into the second category of "Marketing Research" and is intended to provide options, ideas and viewpoints, and to prompt further discussion and action by NERC and the Material Exchanges.
As described earlier in the Overview section, Materials Exchanges are often thwarted by limited budgets and staffing, unclear directives about their mission and responsibilities, overlapping territories between Exchanges, and competing goals within the same State system for waste management (e.g., oversized waste-to-energy facilities that need fuel might prefer to burn wood products as opposed to redistributing furniture items). Another challenge facing Exchanges that maintain an inventory is to find reasonably priced warehouse space. Furthermore, inadequate budgets and staffing may preclude the expansion of a Materials Exchange's reach because there is no mechanism for marketing the advantages and potentialities of the Exchange. It is possible that an Exchange needs to reach a "critical size" in order to stimulate the kind of trading activity that will assure viability and sustainability. There is probably also an upper limit or optimal size that remains manageable within each given Exchange model. More research is needed to assess the economic and organizational implications of the various models exhibited by existing Exchanges. Lastly, other competing pathways for reusable materials may inhibit operation and growth potential for the Exchanges.
Some of the possible competitors with Materials Exchanges might include the following: online trading systems (e.g., E-Bay or Craig's List, Yahoo Auctions, FreeCycle, or Amazon.com), thrift shops, flea markets, pawn shops, and professional recycling companies. These retail operations are more likely to be utilized by individuals, as most companies are not likely to allocate the time needed to list and track the available items.
Professional recycling companies are probably the most significant competitor for items of value, such as computers and other electronics. The ease of dealing with these companies (appraisals, pickup, transport, paperwork, etc.) makes them a very attractive option for a business manager or facility director. Possibly the Materials Exchanges could partner with some of these professional recyclers as a "last step" in the sequence of distribution by the recycling companies, so that they can avoid accumulating massive inventories of low-value items that could possibly be donated to potential users. The compelling question is one of the "value" of a used electronics item; if the item or its parts can be sold (having resale value), then the recycling company would want to resell it; whereas, if the item has low resale value, then the recycling company will probably go for the value of crucial components, such as precious metals. The disassembly process may result in the bulk of the item being discarded as "waste". Common practice in using a recycling firm is for the company owning the items, e.g., computers, to pay for a pickup service. Thus, if the intact computer or other electronic item is seen as "usable" by a different user, then these companies might well be willing to list such items on a Materials Exchange, rather than pay for the pickup and disassembly. Other partners with Materials Exchanges might include the computer manufacturers, who would be willing to contract with or to advertise the Exchanges as a means of enabling a "greener" system for discarded items.
In addition, private sector reuse and surplus businesses might be seen as a competing interest with Materials Exchanges. However, the existence of these firms might obviate the requirement for an Exchange to maintain warehouse space. By having these companies as members of an Exchange, and/or having these firms provide access to new customers, the Exchanges can improve their success and expand their sphere of influence. For example, a set of old wooden tables and chairs in a deteriorated condition may not be attractive enough to sell at a second hand shop. However, if refinished, the set may have greater retail potential and command a much better price. If such items were listed on a Materials Exchange, buyers might include a furniture refinishing business. This approach could foster the development of additional small business operations in a regional economic system, and might be aligned well with city or state economic development plans.
BARRIERS TO EXPANSION OF MATERIALS EXCHANGES
Some of the challenges to effective marketing of the Exchanges would include the following: lack of funding for traditional advertising approaches, identifying and prioritizing appropriate target audiences, coping with the irregular availability of the materials to be exchanged when designing an effective marketing approach, and being able to effectively track the success of different marketing techniques.
To begin with, the throw-away mindset so prevalent in the United States is very hard to change. A business manager, overwhelmed with day-to-day operations, is not likely to spend much time trying to find a user for their discarded equipment or furniture. Often such decisions are made by facilities staff charged with removing the items from their present location. Many companies do not even have a policy for the disposal of such items; rather they are simply considered to be "waste" and will be discarded with the normal waste stream, as long as they are not considered to be toxic or to require any special treatment. Who holds the responsibility to retrain these decision makers to think in terms of managing all "materials" that pass through the business as having value as usable objects, until they no longer function, cannot be repaired, or another user cannot be found? So part of the challenge to Materials Exchanges is to develop an education process that would change these mindsets.
Secondly, the lack of information about the existence of the Materials Exchanges also precludes business managers from utilizing them more extensively. Thus, even if the manager may desire to practice good waste management practices, the level of awareness about the existence and value of Materials Exchanges may be nonexistent. This is probably the biggest, but most important, challenge to be met by the Materials Exchanges if the programs are to grow and prosper.
Lastly, in many cases, tipping fees at landfills are held artificially low by state or municipal authorities. Thus, there may be little incentive to think twice about discarding materials, especially if it will take staff time to track down a potential user of a recyclable or reusable item. Even though the long-term consequences of filling up landfills, increasing pollution, and overusing raw materials may be compelling, the typical business manager is usually focused on short-term decisions and objectives. Since there is almost no likelihood of challenging subsidies created by political leaders, the challenge to the Materials Exchanges is to inform business leaders about the long-term implications and the available resource for better meeting their corporate responsibilities to foster a sustainable society.
On the non-profit side, even though no-cost or low-cost, reusable products may be desirable, the challenges of trying to track down these items using very limited staff resources may be formidable. Hence, if there is no knowledge about the existence of online Materials Exchanges, the chances are great that the agency or organization will "get along without" the needed item. However, it will probably be easier to market the Exchanges to the nonprofits than to the business sector, because users in need of free or low-cost products are likely to have greater motivation. Also, non-profits tend to communicate frequently with one another and to depend heavily on the "word of mouth" method of sharing information.
Municipal policies that might affect the Materials Exchanges could include any of the following: procurement protocols for schools and community centers (e.g., whether used equipment can be purchased); setting of tipping fees at landfills; and recycling programs within the municipality (e.g., pickup programs, what materials are actually required or allowed to be recycled). Municipalities may need to change their "recycling" policies so as to encourage more "reuse." For example, wood furniture and functioning appliances should perhaps have a priority as a "reuse" item, rather than as a "recyclable" item. This shift in emphasis could take place either at the source end of the spectrum (i.e., the generator), or at the receiving end (i.e., the Materials Recycling Facility, where reusable items can be diverted.
TARGET AUDIENCES FOR MATERIALS EXCHANGES
Clearly, any marketing plan for the Materials Exchanges will need to feature targeted entities, with adjustments made for each of these targeted audiences. The targets might include some or all of the following: non-profit organizations (NGO's), community agencies, educational institutions, municipalities, state government offices, and businesses by sector. Residential customers may also be targeted, depending on the design and scope of the Materials Exchange.
Non-profit organizations vary widely (serving almost every segment of the population, providing almost every conceivable type of service to people of all ages, and ranging from very small to very large). Hence, there is no simple design to reach all of them in a consistent manner. Rather, the best way to capture this audience probably lies in raising awareness about the Materials Exchanges through umbrella organizations (for example, the Environment Council in Rhode Island is an overarching group whose members comprise dozens of small to large environmental organizations). Other examples of environmental coalitions are noted in Table II.
Table II: Environmental Coalitions in the Northeast States
| Environment
Council in Rhode Island |
http://www.environmentcouncilri.org/ecri.html |
| Massachusetts
Environmental Collaborative |
http://www.environmentalleague.org/about.html |
| Environmental
League of Massachusetts |
http://www.environmentalleague.org/index.html |
| Connecticut
Fund for the Environment |
http://www.cfenv.org/candp.htm |
| CFE
E-Links |
http://www.cfenv.org/links/ |
| Scorecard
(for Connecticut) Environmental Defense Fund |
http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/state.tcl?usps_abbrev=CT |
| New
Jersey Environmental Federation |
http://www.cleanwateraction.org/njef/ |
| Environmental
Advocates of New York |
http://www.eany.org/ |
| New
York Eco-Groups (ECO-USA Website) |
http://www.eco-usa.net/orgs/ny.shtml |
| Vermont
Public Interest Group (VPIRG) |
http://www.vpirg.org/ |
| Vermont
Environmental Organizations (EnviroSouce.com) |
http://www.enviro-source.com/vt/vt10.html |
| New
England Environmental Organizations |
http://www.biodiversity911.org/ LocalLinks/NorwichVT_ECG.html |
There are many such coordinating coalitions serving other realms, such as the human services, the arts, education, historic preservation activities, civic responsibility, and health support groups. One such example might be the League of Women Voters, with both national and local presence. The League regularly takes on special projects focused on improving public infrastructure and environmental quality. By linking up with these coordinating groups, the Materials Exchanges can more quickly connect with a huge variety of NGO's.
Community agencies are often designed as partnerships between federal, state and local agencies, providing programs tailored to meet a local community need. Such agencies are usually woefully under-funded and would be ideal targets for reusable construction and building materials, since they are often charged with maintaining public housing, or coordinating with low-income homeowners. In general, these agencies represent good customers for receiving a variety of reusable materials. Fortunately, since many of these programs are funded with federal monies, they are reasonably easy to track down through public databases (see Table III for examples).
Table III: Examples of Community Service Agency Information
| Community
Resource Database for Long Island |
http://www.crdli.org/about_crd.html |
| United Way
of Connecticut - 2-1-1 Infoline |
http://www.referweb.net/uwct211/ |
| Connecticut
Community Services - AARP |
http://www.aarp.org/states/ct/ ct-communityservice/ |
| Connecticut
Department of Social Services |
http://www.dss.state.ct.us/svcs/adults.htm |
| Community
Services Network - New Haven Area |
http://www.communityservicesnetwork.org/ |
| United Way
2-1-1 Infoline - Connecticut |
http://www.infoline.org/ |
| Focus Adolescent
Services - Maine |
http://www.focusas.com/Maine.html |
| AccessMaine
- Community Providers |
http://www.accessmaine.org/living_provider.htm |
| Bureau
of Elder and Adult Services - Maine |
http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/beas/ resource/employ.htm |
| Maine Community
Services- AARP |
http://www.aarp.org/states/me/me- communityservice/ |
| Massachusetts
Community Services - AARP |
http://www.aarp.org/states/ma/ma-communityservice/ |
| Massachusetts
Association for Community Action |
http://www.masscap.org/agencies.html |
| Feinstein
Center for Service Learning - URI - RI Agencies |
http://mm.uc.uri.edu/clearinghouse /alpha_agency.asp |
| Rhode Island
Community Services - AARP |
http://www.aarp.org/states/ri/ri-communityservice/ |
Rhode Island Service Alliance |
http://www.riservicealliance.org/ |
| Community
Service Society of New York |
http://www.cssny.org/index.html |
| Council
of Community Services of New York State |
http://www.ccsnys.org/ |
| New York
Public Library Community Services Listings |
http://www.nypl.org/branch/services/cis.html |
| Vermont
Commission on National and Community Service |
http://www.state.vt.us/cncs/ |
| Vermont
Community Stewardship Program |
http://www.vhcb.org/vcsp.html |
| Central
Vermont Community Action Council |
http://www.cvcac.org/default.aspx |
| Dept. of
Health & Human Services - New Hampshire - Programs & Services |
http://www.dhhs.state.nh.us/DHHS/ Programs+Services/default.htm |
| Community
Services Council of New Hampshire |
http://www.dhhs.state.nh.us/DHHS/ Programs+Services/default.htm |
| Seacoast
OnLine - NH Community Service #s |
http://www.psnh.com/Community/ NHMatter/default.asp |
Educational institutions represent a significant potential for utilization of the Materials Exchanges. This category is comprised of colleges, universities, trade schools, professional training programs, public and private schools, and education departments at every level. These institutions and agencies represent sources of reusable items, and are potential customers for reusable items. Some of the region's Exchanges focus exclusively on educators, but most of the Exchanges have not yet fully explored the many potential partnerships with educational institutions. For example, most universities have very rapid turnover of computers and accessories, with some in-house recycling protocols, but commonly end up disposing of unwanted computers via professional recyclers. Educational institutions should be one of the prime targets for the Exchanges. In many of Northeast states, there are statewide databases listing personnel in the public sector. For example, it may be possible to access the names and contact information for municipal-level school purchasing agents through the State Department of Education, or via a Website for the municipality. For this sector, purchases of used science equipment and furniture are more likely to be a policy option (as indicated by an assortment of online sources for science equipment-see Table IV), than would purchases of used computers, because computers are turned over so much more rapidly. However, there may be an undeveloped market for computers that are 3-5 years old, since many universities turn over their computer stock every 2-3 years. Some of the Exchanges have extensive experience in working with school systems, and could take the lead in enabling other Exchanges in their efforts to expand their reach into their local educational community.
Table IV: Examples of Online Sources for Used Science Equipment
| Equipment for Technology & Sciences, Inc. | http://www.equiptechonline.com/ |
| The Sourcebook for Teaching Science |
http://www.csun.edu/~vceed002/ ref/equipment/ |
| Microscopy Database - List of Secondhand
Equipment |
http://www.kaker.com/mvd/used_equip.html |
Municipalities represent a potential market, both as sources of reusable items and/or as new customers for the Exchanges. For example, almost all municipal departments utilize computer equipment in their day-to-day operations, thus would have some kind of policy for discarding of old machines. Likewise, with lean municipal budgets, department managers might look favorably on a source for slightly used computers being generated by a business entity. Meanwhile, many cities use a centralized purchasing procedure for their component schools. By designing an information packet for municipalities, the Materials Exchanges could forge workable partnerships with local government, and in so doing produce a significant increase in the amount of waste diverted from landfills (and increase their savings through avoided disposal costs).
Similar potentialities may exist for targeting state and federal agencies, both in terms of operations (e.g., office equipment, computers and accessories, maintenance and facilities management, and possibly in certain aspects of transportation). For example, because government agencies set up contracts for large fleets of vehicles, policies that favored the reuse of vehicles in situations where accumulated mileage would not be a significant drawback might enable small, low-mileage vehicles of 3-4 years old to be used, rather than purchasing new vehicles. As a case in point, recently General Motors, Ford, and Toyota revealed that they are destroying electric vehicles because the lines of production are being discontinued (see Websites below for details):
http://www.dontcrush.com/press.shtml
http://www.jumpstartford.com/news/newsitem.php?id
=1327&area=ford
http://www.megawattmotorworks.com/display.asp?
dismode=article&artid=155
Why weren't these vehicles transferred to non-profits, government agencies, or low income buyers, rather than being discarded? In addition, by working with appropriate state agencies (e.g. environmental agencies), better policies at the federal, state, and local levels of government could be worked out for encouraging reuse and source reduction.
A major target market is the business sector, at least for most of the Exchanges. While in some cases, businesses primarily represent the generator side of the exchange formula, business to business transfers are also important. Most manufacturing businesses generate products or byproducts that for a variety of reasons may not be able to be sold through their distribution networks (e.g., slightly damaged items, a discontinued design, overproduction, etc.). These items might not be discarded as wastes if the Materials Exchanges were available as an option (for examples, see the Success Stories in Appendix V). Furthermore, all businesses have furniture and equipment that is periodically changed. Contacts with facility managers, maintenance staff, and inventory supervisors might be fruitful in developing a wider customer base for the Exchanges. In addition to manufacturers, firms in the construction, junk removal, home repair, and retail industries should be targeted. Other businesses of interest might include second-hand shops, computer installers, and used auto dealers. A more detailed discussion of strategies for targeting businesses will follow in a later section of this report.
Although this report is not directly focused on residential and individual customers, since most of the Exchanges are targeting businesses and non-profits, these users do represent a huge potential market in terms of appliance and furniture reuse. For the Exchanges that reach out to the individual customer, the marketing challenges lie more in the realm of "branding" the service in a way that the customer remembers the name when they are looking for the service. For example, the name "FreeMarket" utilized by the Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation is quite memorable, but probably needs to be more widely known. In this case, the Exchange could possibly partner with RI municipal waste service providers to distribute a brochure or some other marketing materials to their residential customers.
LOW/NO COST MARKETING STRATEGIES
F
OR MATERIALS EXCHANGES
Several principles underlie low cost, but effective marketing strategies: (a) the strategy should match the intended target market(s); (b) there should be a focus on partnership opportunities; (c) electronic techniques should be utilized; and (d) information packets should be designed for distribution to businesses and nonprofits. The concept of "sustainable marketing" aligns well with the goals of most online Materials Exchanges. Marketing costs for using traditional marketing techniques to launch a new online Materials Exchange can be very expensive. Although grants or gifts may be available to fund specific projects, for the most part, funding is scarce and guerilla marketing techniques are much more likely to be selected.
The concept of "guerilla marketing" represents the idea of
using out of the ordinary methods of marketing to get maximum results
with the minimum investment of resources (see the following for more information): http://www.gmarketing.com or http://www.clickz.com/experts/archives/mkt/start_
up_mkt/article.php/825181
Some of those methods involve direct contact, distribution of brochures in a variety of ways, newsletters set up by the Exchanges, links from other websites, news releases to radio, newspapers, or trade journals, partnering with academic communities, professional organizations or allied industries, working with government agencies, schools and libraries, and seeking sponsors for special events. By taking a joint (regional) approach toward marketing, through the auspices of NERC, the Exchanges will benefit greatly. Templates and models that are developed can be tailored to meet the specific needs of each Exchange.
For example, direct contact would probably work best for educational institutions, municipalities, community agencies, and school systems, as well as for federal and state agencies targeted as potential partners. Yet, given that this type of activity is labor-intensive and time-consuming, this approach might be best linked with college student internships or community volunteers. Essentially, every university and college in New England and New York has an array of internship programs, and usually there is enthusiastic support for any agency or organizations that requests these interns. Internships may necessitate a modest stipend for the work done, or may be available free of charge because the student is conducting the work as part of an academic program or specific course. For more details on setting up internship arrangements, see Appendix VII of this report.
By developing an information packet that explains the workings of each Exchange, provides a summary of the benefits and avoided costs associated with using the Materials Exchanges, and includes some statistics on the effectiveness of the waste diversion activities, the Exchange representative can quickly contact key officials in these sectors to initiate a partnering activity. However, direct contact would not be as efficient or effective for contacting individual consumers/users. In that case, it would be better to request distribution of a simple brochure via the existing waste pickup service (either municipal or private), as an inclusion in utility bills, or as a handout accompanying waste disposal stickers at a municipal office.
The Exchanges could jointly develop templates for different types of brochures that would capture the essence of their activities, and then seek sponsors for the printing and distribution costs as a specific project. Using computer publishing tools, brochures can be inexpensively designed and produced. Samples of possible brochures will be included in Appendix III of this report.
Intrinsic to all marketing approaches is the need for memorable "branding" of the product or service in question. As discussed earlier in this document, at this time the term "materials exchange" is not fully embedded in the consciousness of the public, nor in the targeted sectors that have been discussed. Some of the Exchanges have deliberately designed names to be memorable to users (e.g., Rhode Island's "FreeMarket" and "ResourceXchange", PENCIL, Recycle-A-Bicycle, or Build It Green NYC, just to name a few). Whatever name is chosen, the marketing program must link the name with the service, (i.e., branding the service). One approach to feature a brand name for consumers is to distribute widely some item with the name to be emphasized. For example, consider a bright button or bumper sticker with the name "FreeMarketRI.com" that would be widely distributed in Rhode Island. Soon, everyone would be asking, "what is it?" Simultaneously, many of these queries would result in people visiting the Website.
STRATEGIES FOR TARGETING BUSINESS MARKETS
As for the business market, effective techniques would vary depending on the business sector in question. Some initial contacts might include trade associations, trade journals or newsletters, where a brief news release could be used to create awareness of the services and to establish a branding of the logo and/or website (Examples of news releases are included in Appendix IV). Some examples of potential trade organizations are listed in Table V:
Another possible approach is to prepare an information packet aimed at the business user. These packets could be distributed by summer college interns (as described above) to businesses within a specific geographic area, or within a certain business category. Particular targets for the distribution of information packets might be the waste management businesses, particularly recyclers who get most of their profit from picking up discarded equipment, etc., but maybe only have markets for a small portion of the materials they collect, and the construction sector (which accumulates large quantities of wood, paint, and other building materials from construction and deconstruction activities). Owners of second hand shops and junk removal services often have only a small storage capacity, and might welcome information about the Materials Exchanges as a means of keeping their unsold inventory moving rapidly. Probably the manufacturing trades generate the most quantity of potentially reusable materials, and their very diversity and dispersed distribution constitutes a challenge in terms of letting them know about the services provided by a materials exchange. However, residential and corporate apartment communities represent good potential for collaboration (maintenance departments often have leftover material from installation and rehabilitation operations).
Table V: Recycling Non-Profit and Trade Organizations for Possible Collaborations
Partnering possibilities could be explored with the U.S. Small Business Administration (http://www.sba.gov/), and direct arrangements could be set up with Small Business Development Centers (SBDCs), located throughout the United States, often on university campuses (http://www.sba.gov/sbdc/). One benefit of linking with the SBDCs is the possible access to their extensive mailing and electronic contact lists. This might be quite an effective way to communicate information about the Exchanges to the business sector. Also, state agencies that are charged with economic development may have mailing lists, or may hold conferences where brochures could be made available to business owners.
Distribution of press releases describing successful materials exchanges, or detailing new website features should include weekly newspapers with a dedicated business focus, such as the Providence Business News in Rhode Island, or the Women's Business News in Boston, thus specifically targeting a diversity of business readers.
The motivation for companies to participate in Materials Exchanges include the following: reduced waste handling costs, savings in purchasing costs, increased storage space that can be used for other purposes, tax deductions and community support for donations to non-profit organizations, saving time and effort by staff in finding new users or arranging for waste disposal, creating new business connections, meeting ISO certification 14001 requirements, aligning with corporate environmental objectives, utilizing an environmentally responsible option, or just "doing the right thing." However, many businesses focus primarily on maximizing their revenue stream, with less emphasis on cost containment strategies. Perhaps the greatest obstacle is a lack of awareness of the opportunities provided by Materials Exchanges, either as a market for discontinued or unwanted equipment or supplies, or as a source of raw materials for manufacturing or assembly. The greatest challenge may be to change mindsets of business managers from "Where do I get virgin materials?" to "Where can I get cost-effective, used materials?" It is difficult to move from the concept of "once-through use" of a given product that automatically becomes a "waste material" at the end of its single use, to the more encompassing view of "materials management" that accounts for the entire life cycle of the raw materials fashioned into manufactured products, including embodied energy consumed in their initial production. Converting these subtleties into practical strategies for operating businesses is equally challenging for Materials Exchanges.
STRATEGIES FOR TARGETING NON-PROFIT MARKETS AND COMMUNITY GROUPS
In the nonprofit sector, as described earlier, coordinating councils or umbrella organizations could be targeted first, with distribution of an appropriate brochure, this time focused more on the NGO's as recipients of needed materials. In particular, environmental organizations would be good partners because many of these organizations have their own newsletters and websites. Most of them would probably be more than willing to feature a link to the website of a Materials Exchange, and to publish descriptive information about the Exchanges, the need for recycling, and statistics about the success of the Exchanges. Additionally, brief news releases provided to these environmental NGOs could be used in their newsletters. This would be particularly valuable for attracting individual consumers who might use the Materials Exchanges.
Additionally, staff from the Materials Exchanges (or their coordinating agencies) could sponsor or conduct workshops for NGOs, teachers, or municipal employees, describing the Exchanges and their benefits. These workshops could be focused on environmentally sound waste management approaches, along with the availability of free or low-cost materials for cash-strapped organizations. For example, in Rhode Island, ResourceXchange officials were recently able to assist a local Fire Department facility to totally outfit their office space with free furniture and equipment donated by business members of the Exchange. By sharing information about such success stories for non-profits, Exchange managers could easily capture the attention of other potential users. These workshops would have the added result of enlisting the participants as new supporters, particularly teachers. Coupled with the workshops could be some kind of activity for children to compete in designing posters or other informational tools. Thus, the training process would be far-reaching. For example, in Rhode Island, successful tools for fostering the goals of recycling have included the "School Recycling Report Card," and the "Rhode Island Recycling Club." Similar programs could be developed to focus on reuse possibilities and online Exchanges.
STRATEGIES FOR TARGETING RESIDENTIAL OR INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER MARKETS
In terms of informing the general public about the existence of the Exchanges, their importance to the community, and the effectiveness of their efforts, press releases could be provided to radio stations (required to provide a minimum of public information announcements), specialized newspapers (e.g., "Business News"), and local newspapers who usually harbor a strong sense of community responsibility. The press releases should be sent out regularly (i.e., monthly), and should be forwarded electronically if possible, saving time, paper, and postage. The game plan is to make it easy for the communication media to help (see Appendix IV for sample Press Releases).
Possible advertising tools might include placing a link onto appropriate commercial websites (depending upon the cost involved). For example, "Craigslist" allows businesses to post an ad or a link under a particular category. Also, key words can be registered into the major search engines (e.g., Google, Yahoo, Altavista, Lycos, Ask Jeeves, etc.), so that if someone typed in the words, "free stuff" the website for an exchange would come up, even if those exact words were not on the website. These key words are called "meta tags" and are incorporated into the coding for the Website. More information about the use of Meta tags for web searching is available at the following web sites:
http://www.monash.com/spidap4.html
http://www.apromotionguide.com/metatag.html
http://vancouver-webpages.com/META/mk-metas.html
The Materials Exchanges could benefit from collaboratively developing a metasearch capability, and this option is currently under discussion among the Exchanges.
Another approach is to take advantage of broad spectrum Websites that include links to allied organizations. For example, active Websites such as Idealist, described as "the online meeting place for non-profit organizations, resources, consultants, job seekers, and volunteers." ( http://www.idealist.org ) and Guidestar, providing provides a free service with information on the programs and finances of more than 650,000 American charities and non-profit organizations ( http://www.guidestar.org ) allow for entries describing your organization or program.
Within every northeastern state, there are many "Earth Day" celebrations, along with other outdoor get-togethers in the spring, summer and fall. These are very good venues for distributing brochures and other educational materials about the Exchanges. An excellent handout would be the pencils made from money and blue jeans (part of the materials distributed by the Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation). These could be imprinted with the logos of the appropriate Exchange. Business conferences, workshops, and seminars would also be good sites for distributing brochures and fact sheets touting the benefits of the Exchanges, for example, as mentioned earlier, the Small Business Administration Centers regularly sponsor such activities.
Making speeches to civic clubs and professional organizations, and having brochures available, is an excellent way to expand networking capability. Teachers are often looking for special speakers in their classes to describe civic affairs or public service activities, and libraries often sponsor "speaker series" for the general public. In the process of setting up the appointment, there may be an opportunity to meet with administrators to establish other informational links.
Exchanges may involve buyers and sellers, or may involve Exchanges without money transactions. However, efforts by Materials Exchanges to link generators with possible users may be labor intensive and time consuming. Challenges include the following issues:Tackling these challenges will require partnerships with business, government agencies, non-profit organizations and the academic community. Sharing of resources is essential, along with developing communities of interest. For example, professors and graduate students are always on the lookout for worthwhile research projects (environmental management, economics, policymaking, accounting, etc.). For undergraduates, situational internships are sought after to provide real-world experience. Non-profit organizations have equipment and supply needs, with little monetary resources available, yet may be willing to host a workshop, use their newsletter or website to inform the public about the existence of online Materials Exchanges. Likewise, small businesses can thrive more readily with access to free or inexpensive materials available through online Materials Exchanges, in fact, new businesses may be created to specifically utilize an abundant recycled material for new uses.
The choice of which medium to utilize for sharing the listings is rooted in the type of user base, the funds available, the type of materials being exchanged, and the history and development of the Exchange. Printed materials (e.g., a catalogue of listings) is helpful to businesses who are not accustomed to routine Web searches, or who prefer not to get email or FAX updates on listings. Catalogues are also good marketing tools because they have a lasting impact beyond first glance. However, they are costly and time-consuming to assemble and publish, and need to be updated frequently. A possible alternative for visual advertising might be the production of an insert suitable for newsletters or trade journals. Downloadable electronic brochures might provide some of the advantages of the printed catalog, at lower cost, and with better tools for easily updating the content. An example of such a brochure is available from the Long Island Power Authority Website, and can be found at http://www.lipower.org . The advantage of this approach is a significant savings in mailing costs, while allowing the brochure to be printed on demand by an interested customer. The LIPA brochure also contains a mail-in enrollment form to select a particular type of green energy program (see Appendix III).
Also, some Exchanges use a Fax service for users, providing quick updates on listings and partnership possibilities. This might be a good technique for repeat customers who are constantly looking for either supplies or outlets, but might be seen as an intrusion by new potential customers. Both E-mail lists and Fax updates are best set up by request of the recipient (i.e., by signing up for this "service").
Web listings are included for most of the Exchanges, and after initial setup provide an interactive, accessible mechanism for users at a reasonable cost. However, some users (e.g., understaffed non-profit organizations or new business entities) may not have adequate staff or time for regularly searching the Web for posted information, (i.e., users much "seek out" the information rather than having it packaged in usable form). So, it seems that the marketing challenge is twofold, first, how to make businesses and non-profits aware that the Materials Exchanges exist and provide good opportunities for working together, and secondly, how to actually exchange the information most effectively.
| Some additional ideas that Materials Exchanges
could use for identifying users and/or generators might include: |
||
| (a) | Use SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) Codes
to target similar businesses who may have similar needs/materials,
or to identify materials used by those businesses |
|
| (b) | Use Thomas' Register of Business & Industry, Harris
Directory, and Yellow Pages to identify area businesses and provide
a focus on local commodities |
|
| (c) | Use Internet listings of businesses who specialize
in "green materials" |
|
| (d) | Work with recycling coordinators and economic development
experts (they are often aware of what is being disposed of and what
materials have other uses) |
|
| (e) | Work with local economic development, business and
trade organizations, including Chambers of Commerce and Manufacturing
Extension Partnerships |
|
| (f) | Use referrals from successful Exchanges, helping participants
to network with peers |
|
| (g) | Promote success stories through trade association
newsletters |
|
| (h) | Target specific individuals within companies (department
or position may vary from one company to another, i.e., purchasing,
inventory manager, facilities staff, etc.) |
|
| (i) | Use vendors who travel between companies (e.g., computer
service providers) and repeat customers to promote the concept of
Materials Exchanges |
|
| (j) | Develop promotional materials for new startup companies
(design for minimum waste production and procurement of used materials
- more subtle management of the value chain) |
|
| (k) | Work with manufacturers in related industries, to
discuss targeting of materials for exchange |
|
| (l) | Provide information at trade shows and similar events
(either create a display booth, or simply distribute brochures or
listings catalogs) |
|
| (m) | Provide samples of materials at trade shows, environmental
fairs |
|
| (n) | Sponsor school contests or competitions on "how
to reuse these materials" |
|
| (o) | Work with waste management companies and municipal
waste management agencies to target specific materials to be exchanged |
|
| (p) | Use GIS mapping techniques to target the best and
most cost-efficient transactions (although transport distances vary
with the value of the material and the cost of disposal, usually a
limit of about 250 miles radius is standard practice); use this information
to target materials for exchange |
|
| (q) | Work with environmental oversight agencies to explore
the legality and feasibility of using permit databases to identify
potential users of Materials Exchanges (e.g., questions of privacy
of information, protected trade secrets, etc.) |
|
| (r) | Work with municipal, state, and federal government
agencies to create disposal policies and protocols that promote reuse
and Materials Exchanges (e.g., computer disposal by state universities
or government agencies, or improved distribution systems for government
surplus inventory) |
|
| (s) | Actively search for websites where links to a particular
Materials Exchange Website would be mutually beneficial (e.g., B2Bfree.com,
EPA's "trash to cash" web page, Earth 911, Recycling Today,
and Zero Waste America) |
|
| (t) | Procure listings on appropriate electronic academic
library systems |
|
Many of the ideas listed above were derived from the New York City Materials Exchange Roundtable Final Report (February 1998), with updates derived from a variety of sources.
COMPUTER DATABASES FOR STORING, ORGANIZING,
AND
TRACKING LISTINGS
Computer databases are essential for managing the listings, organizing the membership information, tracking the usage patterns, and evaluating the effectiveness of the programs. In addition, recordkeeping, monthly summaries, and in some cases, invoicing, must be integrated into the databases. Since funding of some Exchanges is based on the statistics of waste diversion, the tracking function becomes even more important. Given that staff resources are usually limited, it is necessary to design good database management techniques in order to meet all these objectives. It is important to make sure that all the databases are compatible, but often as the Exchanges grow, the databases are set up with different software or hardware, or at the very least, with different versions of software or operating systems. Thus, periodic update and improvements are necessary to assure effective operation of the database management.
Entering information is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Thus, databases that allow the user or lister to enter as much information as possible are more efficient. This is probably best accomplished using "pull down lists" that achieve some measure of consistency with entries. It is especially useful to have an automatic tracking system for capturing statistics on the Exchanges made (e.g., at the time an item is exchanged, that the zip code of the user and/or generator be entered, along with the quantity transferred, this information can be easily recaptured and mapped to track the amount of waste diverted, along with the locational data (e.g., zipcode designation). One of the most challenging problems is how to get the old listings removed from the database in a timely manner. Although this could probably be set up to be an automatic function at the time that an exchange is executed, most of the older Exchanges do not function in this manner, and it therefore becomes incumbent upon either the lister or the exchange staff to periodically update the listings.
Other information that can be used for tracking and evaluation of the exchanges made include the value of the materials exchanged, the quantity, volume or weight of materials exchanged, or the number of Exchanges made. The most desirable methodology would enable Materials Exchanges to collect and track desired measures of success in an automatic way, using computer tools to do so. However, Exchanges also could use follow-up letters or telephone calls to listers and/or users, but this is an expensive, time-consuming activity. Diverted tonnage may be easier to measure than dollars saved so most Exchanges focus on the volume of materials exchanged. In order to accurately assess the actual dollars saved, researchers need to carry out complex calculations based on material value, potential for resale, depreciation, transport costs, landfill tipping fees, and long term landfill capacity. This situation was summarized by Suzanne LaLong, Executive Director of the Onondaga County Resource Recovery Agency (OCCRA), who notes that "the cost/benefit equation is really much more complex than simply comparing costs of collection and processing..." and who then goes on to explain some of the variables, which include the varied public/private collection system in the county, the types of disposal utilized, the outsourced recycling activities, and the inability to get full disclosure of information by private firms (Hadley, 1997). Possibly the use of life cycle estimates for a given type of equipment or product might provide usable estimates of cost savings to industry or cost avoidance for waste management agencies. Also, computerized data-mining techniques applied to past data could be utilized for assembling additional statistical techniques to track effectiveness of the Materials Exchanges.
Assessing the results of an exchange service is required by funding sources of many of the Exchanges, but in the absence of such a requirement, should be carried out as a part of good management practices. Tracking performance allows for goal setting and serves as an early warning system for areas needing attention. Standardization of measurement instruments would permit better comparison among Exchanges. By setting up a consistent reporting period (e.g., monthly) and developing a standard form for recording performance, the Exchanges could possibly better coordinate their efforts at expanding their influence in the Northeast region. Standardizing data formats, categories of reused materials, populations served, and volume of wastes diverted would make the databases more compatible; this topic is currently under discussion among the Exchanges. Suggestions for the components of a reporting form have been summarized for the Minnesota Materials Exchange Alliance by Barb Nesheim, as reported in Resource Recycling Magazine, November 2000.
POSSIBLE PARTNERSHIPS FOR MATERIALS EXCHANGES
In addition to the partnering described already (e.g., federal, state, and municipal agencies, environmental NGO's), direct partnerships could be developed. One of the most obvious possibilities is to establish working relationships with universities, where academic professionals from many fields may be interested in working with Materials Exchanges in the fields of marketing, risk assessment, accounting practices, environmental policymaking, etc. Professors have the ability to seek grants to explore new ideas for management, funding, and planning for public services; they often have graduate students who are seeking cooperative arrangements for gaining experience, and undergraduates looking for internship opportunities. In turn, most universities today have ample computer facilities and staffing, and are often willing to host websites or provide programming expertise for public services, for only a modest fee.
Other approaches would include direct arrangements whereby a company producing a reusable product in an ongoing fashion might welcome the development of markets for that product. For example, the Sherwin Williams Paint Company was targeted by the Rhode Island Resource-X-change in a partnering arrangement whereby outdated paints (still usable) are made available to nonprofits for refurbishing or renovation purposes. By identifying classes of products that have expiration dates (and would thereby be removed from sellable inventory), and targeting the companies that produce those products, many possible partnerships might emerge. Another example might be residential and corporate apartment communities (maintenance departments often have leftover material from installation and rehabilitation operations).
Possibly auto junkyards would benefit greatly from being able to keep down their inventory by utilizing the Materials Exchanges when needed. This would also have the benefit of keeping the junkyard operations at a manageable size.
Another set of possible partners might be utility companies, who often include public service announcements with the invoices mailed to customers. Again, an appropriate brochure could be developed for this purpose. This would be particularly helpful for business customers. An example of a utility company (Public Service of New Hampshire, part of Northeast Utilities) program to support community service can be viewed at the following website: http://www.psnh.com/Community/NHMatter/default.asp.
One type of partnership that might be quite fruitful for Materials Exchanges might be to seek out liaisons with art and design programs at universities and in public schools, looking for creative materials to advertise the Exchanges (i.e., buttons, magnets, calendars, pens, pencils, preferably made of recycled materials). These items have a lasting impact because they are placed on desks or walls and act as an ongoing reminder. Poster contests would also add visual impact and winning entries could possibly be posted in public places for ongoing impact.
Partnerships with educators could result in the development of curriculum modules designed for different age groups that would focus on the concept of materials management and provide information about the variety of online Materials Exchanges. This would have several beneficial results, educating the next generation of decision makers, stimulating more educators to become involved directly with Materials Exchanges, thereby raising awareness of the waste management problems confronting us at this time, and stimulating creative solutions to these complex problems.
Schools, along with other municipal departments, need to know about the Exchanges in order to obtain needed furniture and equipment at an affordable cost. Recent surveys seem to indicate that most schools and municipalities in the Northeast region have little familiarity with Materials Exchanges, and have not utilized the Exchanges to a large extent, most commonly because they don't know about the opportunity. However, for most schools, purchases of supplies and equipment are made through a centralized office. Timing is important in this matter, since schools usually plan their budgets in November-December, finalize the budgets in February-March, and purchase items from April-July. They are further limited in their purchasing by the need for competitive bids, and in some cases may be bound by state contracts. This reality calls for well structured liaisons with the Materials Exchanges that are in place before the budgeting and bidding process takes place.
In order for schools and municipalities to partner well with the Materials Exchanges, a clear description of the benefits and procedures to be derived should be developed. As described elsewhere in this report, a template for such an information packet could be co-developed by the Exchanges and NERC, and adapted as needed by each Exchange. Procedures for finding needed items and bringing them onsite should be flexible and convenient. Clear descriptions are essential, and digital photos are desirable, where technically possible. This is easier if the materials are warehoused, but today's digital tools would make it more manageable (e.g., thumbnail photos are relatively easy and cost-effective to send electronically and be incorporated into a database). A rating system for describing the condition of the items for exchange should be agreed upon by users and Exchange managers, and should be consistent for all Exchanges. Models for rating systems could be collaboratively developed by the Exchanges. It is probably desirable for Exchange managers to initially work with liaison groups (e.g., State Educational Collaboratives, Superintendent's Councils, or umbrella groups like the ReStore and Residuum in Vermont, Recycling for Rhode Island Education, and Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Network Alliance in Massachusetts), when trying to track down purchasing agents at municipal school systems or individual schools. For school districts, the most interested parties are superintendents, business managers, and grounds and maintenance staff, whereas, for municipalities, purchasing officers and finance directors seem to be influential in these decisions.
Partnerships with libraries (public and university) could result in better information being disseminated about the importance of Materials Exchanges, and opportunities for public discussion and presentations could be developed.
Partnering with organizations such as Salvation Army or Goodwill Industries, as recipients of listed materials might enable the Exchanges to align with the public access available to these large entities. Likewise, pairing with Habitat for Humanity would also generate good publicity and would provide the added benefit of moving that organization in the direction of choosing reusable materials for their projects.
To address the problem of procuring appropriate and cost-effective warehouse space (for those Exchanges that maintain an inventory of items to be distributed), partnerships that allow for sharing of warehouses with other non-profits (e.g., Salvation Army, Goodwill Industries), or with state and local government agencies that deal with unused properties (e.g., tax departments, facility managers, government surplus programs, and economic development). For example, if a new industrial park were being developed, it would be advantageous for the Materials Exchange to be involved and even have a presence onsite (i.e., a "green service" for the businesses).
Other successful ventures and partnerships are listed in Appendix V: Success Stories for Materials Exchanges.
FUNDING MECHANISMS & SELF-SUFFICIENCY
Funding mechanisms vary widely among Materials Exchanges, and to some degree the funding is tied to the design and sponsorship of the Exchange. Government agencies and/or public corporations may provide services for no charge, whereas, private or non-profit organizations may need to obtain operating revenues by charging fees for service. Conversely, government mandates for an Exchange may require that it be self-supporting, thus necessitating a fee structure. In general, most Exchange managers seek to become self-sufficient in terms of operating costs, and at the very least to meet waste diversion goals set forth by the municipality or state in which they operate (thus providing cost avoidance for waste disposal). Some of the approaches for generating revenue, paying operating costs, and attempting to achieve self-sufficiency are listed below:
| (a) | Fees to users (membership in Exchange, fee for transfers
made) can provide revenue for operating expenses. |
|
| (b) | Contracts with companies listing or procuring (based
on percentage of savings engendered, e.g., the Chadwick Financial
Corporation model for assessing credits associated with non-performing
assets such as unwanted equipment and surplus inventory) may require
more up-front staff time in setting up arrangements, but may provide
better long-term arrangements. (See Appendix VI, Item (5) for more
information regarding this program). |
|
| (c) | Exchanges that mainly process low-value materials have
a more difficult time to meet operational costs; yet, these materials
may be more plentiful, and it may not be feasible to limit materials
to high-value items. |
|
| (d) | Charging fees for services rendered may add a "business-like"
element to the transactions, especially exchanges between businesses. |
|
| (e) | Sponsorship of special programs by businesses can provide
good marketing for the businesses, and open up networks for developing
new partnerships or expanding the reach of the Materials Exchange
in that business sector. |
|
| (f) | Some Exchanges focus on the goal of maximizing the
waste diverted, rather than generating funds to support program operation.
Under this model the costs of the online Materials Exchange may be
embedded in the operational budgets of the entire waste disposal system,
and the assessments to be made involve the relative advantage of avoiding
waste disposal costs, both short-term and long-term. |
|
| (g) | Staffing for most Exchanges is minimal, due to limited
budgets, but a dependency on volunteers and interns can stretch these
resources. Sources for volunteers might include Americorps VISTA,
colleges and universities, and community-based organizations. (See
Appendix VII for ideas about finding interns for special projects). |
|
| (h) | Fees for catalogues or fax services can supplement
outreach activities. |
|
| (i) | Grants obtained from private foundations might be targeted
to fund outreach activities and setting up creative partnerships (e.g.,
Millennium Exchange, American Plastics Council). |
|
| (j) | Partnerships with government agencies (municipal, state,
and federal) might include liaisons with departments or agencies focused
on economic development, education, environmental protection, or community
services. |
|
| (k) | Trade and business associations (e.g., Chambers of
Commerce) might be supportive of expanding the reach of the Materials
Exchanges by providing mailing lists for members, including brochures
in their own mailings, listing the Exchanges on their Websites, and
setting up speaking engagements or short presentations. |
Effective documentation of wastes diverted, cost savings to exchange users, partnerships developed among businesses, and benefits derived by non-profits who take advantage of the Materials Exchanges are the best advertising to attract new users. These reports can also be utilized when applying for grants or other donations. NERC could seek out economics professors who might want to research and characterize the complex cost/benefit dynamics of online Materials Exchanges, and by so doing be able to benchmark the objectives for moving toward self-sufficiency and achieving sustainable Exchanges.
In short, just as business users are encouraged to consider cost savings as a type of revenue stream for the business, the Materials Exchanges need to view their networking and outreach as part of their own cost savings and long-term support system.
QUESTIONS RAISED FOR MATERIALS EXCHANGES
The following questions are posed to the individual Materials Exchanges, as a tool for bringing into discussion the complexities of managing the ever-changing dynamics confronted by staff as they attempt to expand the reach and the efficacy of their respective Exchanges. It is hoped that the successes and challenges of one Exchange may enable another to move forward more quickly. To borrow from a hackneyed expression, there is no need to reinvent the wheel over and over.RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MATERIALS EXCHANGES
| (1) | The Materials Exchanges need to address
some basic questions affecting all members: |
|
| (a) | The designation of "materials exchanges" as a substitute
for "waste exchanges" causes a "branding problem"
because the term is not intuitive or familiar to most people. Most
business decision makers will be familiar with the concept of waste
avoidance, source reduction, and waste exchange because these terms
have been used for several years. However, the idea of "materials
management" is only slowly becoming integrated into business
practice and everyday vocabulary, especially for small businesses.
Thus, businesses may be unlikely to use the term "materials
management" when searching to find a market for discontinued,
outdated, or depreciated equipment and supplies, and, instead, be
more likely to use the term "recycled" or "waste
exchange." Thus, although the waste management industry and
regulatory agencies are committed to changing mindsets and moving
away from the concept of "once-through" use of materials
that are then categorized as "waste," businesses are still
thinking in those old terms, hence, the branding problem. To effectively
market the "Materials Exchanges" and spread the word about
this valuable resource for businesses, we somehow need to resolve
the mismatch of terminology. |
|
| (b) | A second question to be addressed is that the general public still
thinks of "reuse" as a form of "recycling" and
the public firmly supports recycling programs. Thus, when the waste
management industry and the regulatory agencies attempt to discriminate
between "recycling" and "reuse" they are in
fact decoupling a newly emphasized activity ("reuse")
from a very broadly accepted and endorsed activity ("recycling").
Although there may be a good bureaucratic rationale for doing this,
it adds to the marketing challenge (i.e., creating two brands and
treating the markets as separate, or even competing, entities, when
in fact there are crossovers). Might it not be better to co-advertise
the programs and allow the public to remain in its "comfort
zone" where "reuse" is a type of "recycling?"
In other words, from this perspective, "reuse" is using
the whole product for its originally intended use, while "recycling"
is taking it apart and reassembling the units in another form or
for another purpose. |
|
| (c) | A third question to be resolved is the effort to separate the
"marketplace" for individual generators/consumers from
that of the business generators/consumers? Although tracking procedures
and management techniques may benefit from this separation, the
added costs of maintaining two separate entities, particularly for
marketing, may not warrant the separation. |
|
| (d) | Lastly, given that "reuse" is still lumped with "recycling"
in the eyes of the general public, then the perception of "the
high cost of recycling programs" is going to haunt the expansion
of "reuse" programs as well. Economists and the media
are quick to use short term cost measures (i.e., the relative cost
of collecting, sorting, storing, and processing "waste"
versus "recyclables") rather than assessing the longer
term costs of the entire waste management system (thus more accurately
recognizing the avoided costs of traditional waste disposal when
recycling and reuse programs are introduced into the mix). This
short-term thinking leads people to the conclusion that "recycling"
programs, although desired by the public as a needed service that
they support, are not really cost-effective. As municipal operating
budgets get slimmer each year, and need to be stretched even further,
it becomes highly tempting to scrap the recycling pickup and processing.
Reuse programs (including online Materials Exchanges) may suffer
by being painted into the same corner. How can we convince economists
and public policy makers to focus on longer term, system-wide cost
analyses, thus assigning accurate values to waste diversion programs? |
|
| (2) | In order to move forward in marketing
the Materials Exchanges, there is a need to share assessments about
successful ventures and cost-effective ways of managing Exchanges,
and to work collaboratively to develop templates for brochures, information
packets, news releases, and branding strategies. |
|
| (3) | The Materials Exchanges need to continue to refine and develop good tracking methods, and to convey this information about their successful operations to local, state, and federal government officials. | |
Andrews, Clinton J. and Jamie Mauer. 2000.
"Materials Exchanges: An Exploratory U.S. Survey." Report prepared
on July 31, 2000, Rutgers University.
Available: http://radburn.rutgers.edu/andrews/projects
Beck, R.W., Inc. 2001.
"U.S. Recycling Economic Information Study." Prepared for the
National Recycling Coalition.
Available: http://www.nrc-recycle.org/resources/rei/studyresults.htm
Beling, Christine. 2000.
"The give-and-take of Materials Exchanges." Resource Recycling
Magazine (November, 2000)
Blackwell, J.R. 2004. "Virginia group helps industries, businesses
find viable options." Richmond Times-Dispatch,
distributed by Knight Ridder Tribute Business News, Washington, DC, September
23, 2004. Available:http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?RQT=309&Vinst=
PQD&VType=PQD&sid=10&index=5&SrchMode=1&Fmt=3&did
=000000697622731&clientid=5046
"A Brief Primer on Marketing for Non-Profits."
Available: http://www.nonprofits.org/npofaq/19/98.html
Dimino, Resa & Barbara Warren. 2004.
Reaching for Zero: A Citizens Plan for Zero Waste in New York City.
Available: http://www.consumersunion.org/other/zero-waste/reuse.html (Accessed 08/27/05)
Convio, Inc. 2005
"The Basics of Email Marketing for Nonprofits: Using Email Communications
to Build and Strengthen Constituent Relations Online".
Environmental Protection Agency. 1996.
"The Consumer's Handbook for Reducing Solid Waste." EPA
530-K-96-003 (September 1996)
NOTE: Excellent source - Success Stories of Exchanges in the U.S.
"Environmental Protection Agency. 2003.
"Reuse + Recycling = Waste Reduction: A Guide for Schools &
Groups." EPA 530-K-03-001 (July 2003)
Hadley, Mark. Complex economics muddy debate over recycling.
The Central New York Business Journal 11(19):1.
Available: http://www.cnybj.com
New York City Materials Exchange Roundtable: A Final Report-Internet
Version. 1998.
Conducted by the Cornell Waste Management Institute, sponsored by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region II, on behalf of the New
York City Department of Sanitation, November 14, 1997.
Available: http://cwmi.css.cornell.edu/WastRed/MatlExch.html Accessed May 31, 2005.
Wallace, Brice. 2004.
"Garbage In, Profits Out." Desert News. Salt Lake City,
UT. March 15, pg. C-01.
Available:http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?RQT=309&Vinst=
PROD&VName=PQD&VType=PQD&sid=10&index=38&
SrchMode=1&Fmt=3&did=000000579148251&clientid=5046
Zuckerman, Faye B. 2005.
"Recycle, Reuse, Freecycle." Providence Sunday Journal, LIFESTYLES,
April 17, 2005, pp.7-9.
APPENDIX I: FACT SHEETS FOR MEMBER EXCHANGES
(The Fact Sheets for the member exchanges will be attached in this Appendix, and will also be summarized in a small brochure). The following abbreviations are used in the Fact Sheets and in the summary below (Table I):
Business Model for Exchange:
GA-Governmental Agency Program
GNGO-Governmental Agency/NGO Partnership
NGO-Non-Governmental Program
FPB-For Profit Business Program
Goals and Fees:
RW-Program to Reduce Wastes
FSus-Program to Foster Sustainability
CFP-Charge Fee for Covering Costs of Exchanging Products
CFO-Charge Fee to Cover Costs of Operating Exchange
CM-Charge Fee for Membership
PS-Public Service Effort
FE-Free Exchange
| Appendix I, Table I: Comparison of Materials
Exchanges by Type |
| Name of Exchange | Business Model for Exchange | Goals & Fees |
| Build It Green! NYC |
NGO | FSus, CFP, CFO |
| City Harvest |
NGO | PS, FE |
| FreeMarketRI |
GA | PS, FE, RW |
| Furnish a Future |
GNGO | PS, FE |
| Hudson Valley Materials Exchange |
GNGO | RW, FSus, CFP, CFO |
| Lower East Side Ecology Center |
NGO | FSus, PS, FE |
| Maine Materials Exchange |
GNGO | CFP, CFO |
| Massachusetts Materials Exchange |
GA | CFO, RW |
| Materials for the Arts |
NGO | PS, FE |
| Materials Resource Center |
NGO | PS, FE |
| New Hampshire Materials Exchange |
NGO | CFP |
| NY Wa$teMatch |
GNGO | CFP, PS, FE, RW |
| PENCIL |
NGO | PS, FE |
| Per Scholas, Inc. |
NGO | CFP, CFO |
| ReCONNstruction Center |
NGO | CFP, CFO, PS |
| Recycle-A-Bicycle |
NGO | PS, RW, CFO, CFP |
| ResourceXchange (Rhode Island) |
GA | PS, FE, RW |
| ReStore Home Improvement Center |
FPB | RW, CFP, CFO |
| ReTech Inc. |
NGO | PS, FE |
| Set Recycling Hotline |
NGO | PS, FE |
| StoreHouse |
NGO | PS, FE |
| Tools for Schools |
NGO | CFP, PS |
| Vermont Business Materials Exchange |
GNGO | PS, FE, RW |
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Build It Green! NYC
Contact Information for Exchange:
Justin Green, Program Director
jgreen@cecenter.org
718-777-0132 (Tel) 718-777-0122 (Fax)
3-17 26th Avenue
Astoria, NY 11102-4119
Website for Exchange:
http://www.bignyc.org/index.html
History & Background of Exchange:
Build It Green! NYC is a project of the Community Environmental
Center. For over ten years, the Community Environmental Center
has been helping people throughout the New York metro area improve their
quality of life, enhance sustainability of housing, and develop local
economies through educational and weatherization technical assistance
services. By launching a new program in 2005, Build It Green! (BIG), CEC
continues to provide New Yorkers with even greater resources to enhance
their home and community environments.
Build It Green! NYC offers all New Yorkers a one-stop-source for green building products, resources, and services. By providing an outlet for affordable green building products and services BIG! prevents waste, improves our environment, creates jobs and spurs local economic development. The cornerstone of this program is a 17,500 square feet warehouse in Astoria, Queens. The Build It Green! Warehouse offers a wide variety of affordable, used and surplus building materials, along with a line of reasonably-priced new, green building supplies, such as low-VOC pain and non-toxic cellulose insulation.
Build It Green! has also launched its Deconstruction Services. To date, BIG! has completed two large-scale commercial deconstruction projects which have saved over 45 tons of reusable building materials from being discarded, and appropriately managed 12 tons of recyclables destined for the landfill. In the near future, Build It Green! will be integrating green building consultancy into its service offerings.
ReBuild It! NYC, a partner of Build It Green! , can provide New York City-specific information on establishing a deconstruction or building-materials reuse business. For more information on these organizations and other deconstruction operations, visit the NYCWastele$$ website.
Mission of Exchange:
Build It Green! NYC aims to divert reusable building materials from the
waste stream, while also providing the public with access to affordable
and environmentally-friendly building materials. The Build It Green Warehouse,
NYC's only building materials reuse center is located in Astoria, Queens,
and sells salvaged and surplus building materials, making available great
products at half or below their new price, while helping to keep perfectly
useful material out of the landfill.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Construction Materials (70 tons in 6 months)
Business Model for Exchange:
Non-government Organization (NGO); Foster Sustainability (FSus)
Collection of Fees:
Charge for recovering cost of exchanging products (CFP); charge for covering
costs of operating exchange (CFO)
Other Relevant Information:
NYC's businesses, non-profits, and residents can shop at and/or donate to the BIG! Warehouse, and can take advantage of the growing line of resources
and services. BIG! is open Wednesday through Saturday, 11am - 6:30 pm.
Donations (drop-off and pick-up) are by appointment only.
Sources of Information:
Build It Green! Website
http://www.bignyc.org
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
City Harvest
Contact Information for Exchange:
Jessica Brown, Senior Manager, Food Development
jbrown@cityharvest.org
Jennifer McLean, Director, Food Development
jmclean@cityharvest.org
575 8th Avenue, 4th Floor
New York, NY 10018
917-351-8755 (Tel) 917-351-8720 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.cityharvest.org/
History & Background of Exchange:
City Harvest is the product of common sense. In 1981 Helen verDuin
Palit, a soup kitchen worker, noticed that neighboring restaurants were
wasting good food every day. Seeing an opportunity to bolster the food
supply at the soup kitchen, she gathered volunteers and borrowed cars
and vans to transport the food from where it was not needed to where it
was needed very much. Thus, City Harvest was born.
City Harvest (CH) has distributed more than 100 million pounds of food to a network of more than 800 emergency food programs throughout New York City. The organization now delivers an average of 53,000 pounds of food daily - 19.5 million pounds this year.
City Harvest's common-sense, cost-effective approach remains unchanged, and is intent on working efficiently to help the greatest number of people possible. Picking up and delivering food the same day keeps costs down. Currently, the cost to deliver a pound of food is just 26 cents, making City Harvest a smart, simple solution to ending hunger in New York City.
City Harvest rescues excess, safe food donated by restaurants, caterers, hotels, supermarkets, manufacturers, distributors, and farms-any establishment that has surplus food that would otherwise be wasted-and then redistributes it free of charge to agencies that feed New York City's hunger community. CH also teaches people how to use the products provided, as well as to make the most of their food budgets through their Operation Frontline classes.
CH accepts all food-safe food and utilizes food grade tins, lids and bags for food collection. If you have less than 20 lbs of food, their "Street Fleet" team will be dispatched to collect it and deliver it to food agencies. If you have more than 20 lbs, CH can send a refrigerated truck to make the pickup.
Mission of Exchange:
City Harvest exists to end hunger in communities throughout
New York City. The organization meets this vision through food rescue
and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Food (In 2004, diverted approximately 20 million pounds - 10,000
tons - of safe food from the waste stream)
Business Model for Exchange:
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)
Collection of Fees:
Public Service/Free Exchange (PSFE)
Sources of Information:
City Harvest Website
http://www.cityharvest.org
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
FreeMarketRI
Contact Information for Exchange:
Paul A. Caccia, Waste Prevention Manager
paulc@rirrc.org
Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation
65 Shun Pike
Johnston, RI 02919-4512
401-942-1430 x115 (Tel) 401-942-0239 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.freemarket.org
History & Background of Exchange:
The Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation, a state agency dedicated
to providing the public with environmentally sound programs and facilities
to manage solid waste, in conjunction with the Management Resource Center
of Bryant University, has developed two online materials exchanges, one
focused on matching businesses, nonprofits and government agencies ( http://www.resourceXchange.org ), and one dedicated to homeowners and individual consumers (http://www.freemarketRI.org ).
The website for homeowners and individual consumers - FreeMarketRI is a listing service for residents who want to give or get free reusable goods for the home, garage, and garden, in an attempt to reduce the amount of these goods being discarded into the Rhode Island Central landfill. FreemarketRI is partnered with Eureka Recycling from Minneapolis, MN, and is a service for Rhode Island residents.
Mission of Exchange:
To reduce the amount of reusable goods thrown away by individuals and
homeowners in Rhode Island, and thereby reduce the volume of waste being
discarded into the Central Landfill.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Variety of materials (FreeMarketRI.org has signed up approximately 21,000
members in Rhode Island since March 2004, and members have diverted an
estimated 103,000 pounds of goods from the Rhode Island central landfill
in 2004-2005).
Business Model for Exchange:
Government Agency Program focused on reducing wastes, as a Public Corporation
in Rhode Island (GA)
Collection of Fees:
Public Service/Free Exchange (PSFE); Program to Reduce Waste (RW)
Sources of Information:
ResourceXchange Website:
http://www.resourcexchange.org
Free Market RI Website
http://www.freemarketri.org
Article in Providence Sunday Journal, April 17, 2005
Zuckerman, Faye B. 2005. "Recycle, Reuse, Freecycle." Providence
Sunday Journal, LIFESTYLES, April 17, 2005, pp.7-9.
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Furnish a Future
Contact Information for Exchange:
Myung Lee, Director
mlee@pfth.orgm
476 Jefferson Street, 2nd Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11237-2330
718-875-5353 (Tel) 718-418-9218
Website for Exchange:
http://www.partnershipforthehomeless.org/programs/
furnish_a_future.html
History & Background of Exchange:
The Partnership for the Homeless began in 1982 with a single emergency
shelter for men in the basement of a Greenwich Village church. What many
then thought was a temporary crisis has become a chronic social problem
that affects increasing numbers of New Yorkers. For over two decades,
the Partnership has developed programs to meet the changing needs of homeless
people in our city. Outreach teams, social workers, case managers, housing
specialists, job trainers, legal advocates, nutritionists, cooks and volunteers
provide shelter and nourishment, services, skills, provide ongoing support
that enables thousands of people each year to navigate the difficult road
from homelessness to permanent housing and greater independence. Today,
PFTH operate an array of programs that address the complex needs of homeless
New Yorkers.
Since 1992, The Furnish a Future (FAF) program has been collecting furniture and house wares from donors in all five boroughs, and will pick up donations if necessary. Their clients, most of who are referred by the Department of Homeless Services, go "shopping" at their warehouse. All items are provided free of charge to the clients, and selected items are delivered at no cost to the clients.
Mission of Exchange:
The Partnership for the Homeless is committed to partnering with the faith
community, neighborhood-based organizations, business and government to
attack the root causes of homelessness and empower homeless people to
leave the city's streets and shelters for lives of independence and financial
stability.
The Furnish a Future program provides formerly homeless individuals and families the essential furniture and house wares needed to turn the bare rooms of their new apartments into comfortable and livable homes.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Furniture (In 2004, FAF provided tons of reusable furniture and household
items to over 2,000 households in the NYC metro area)
Business Model for Exchange:
Government agency/NGO Partnership (GNGO)
Collection of Fees:
Public Service/Free Exchange (PSFE)
Sources of Information:
Partnership for the Homeless Website:
http://www.partnershipforthehomeless.org
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Hudson Valley Materials Exchange
Community Warehouse
Contact Information for Exchange:
Jill Gruber, Executive Director
hvme@hvc.rr.com
1101 First Street, Building #404
Stewart International Airport
New Windsor, NY 12553
845-567-1445 (Tel) 845-567-1536 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.hvmaterialsexchange.com/
History & Background of Exchange:
The Hudson Valley Materials Exchange (HVME) was originally a municipal
program sponsored by the Town of New Paltz and funded by NYS Department
of Economic Development- Office of Recycling Market Development, beginning
in March 1993.
The original purpose of the program was to establish a local waste exchange listings catalog similar to that of the industrial regional waste exchanges, but focusing on local wastes in smaller quantities closer to home. The art and education communities were targeted as users of the materials because of the nature of the first listings published and the demographics of the area (the Hudson Valley has one of the highest percentages of artists in the country). Initial responses to the first listings included requests for detailed descriptions of the materials.
Listers were asked to provide samples of the listed materials and found that they were very different than described. Samples of the listed materials were collected and then potential users were invited to come and view the samples. The plan was to give them the listing information of the materials they were interested in, and they would make the arrangements for the collection of the ones they wanted. Upon executing this plan we found that the viewers of the samples were not the ones to make the decisions about the materials. They needed to take some of the samples back to their decision makers. It then became necessary to collect increasingly larger amounts of sample materials. However, users were not willing to travel an hour to collect the materials but were willing to take them from us.
Within a year after publishing the first listing catalog, HVME collected and distributed nearly ten tons of reusable waste materials from their tiny 400 sq. foot warehouse. As the initial 20 companies began to look at their waste stream through our eyes, the volume of the materials they wanted to donate became too great to handle in the space we had. In addition, our users were starting to come from areas far outside the small town of New Paltz. Consequently, HVME incorporated as a non profit in January, 1995, and moved to a larger (3000 sq. ft) facility called "The Community Warehouse" in September, 1995. They started charging a small membership fee in November, 1994, with additional fees for some materials in February, 1996.
To date HVME has raised over $120,000 from the sale of materials, diverted over 2000 tons of materials from the Hudson Valley waste stream with a disposal and purchasing cost avoidance of over $1,000,000. In 1997, HVME set out to become financially self-sufficient through our own activities as opposed to funding through grants from government agencies. To that end, they decided to expand the Community Warehouse to include used/surplus building materials.
By identifying and collecting preventable waste appropriate for the Community Warehouse through their Waste Assessment Services, HVME helps local companies to minimize waste disposal costs, free up valuable storage space, and in most cases receive a tax-deduction for donated materials. By distributing reusable materials from the Community Warehouse (ranging from non-traditional arts supplies to building materials) HVME enriches the learning experiences of students and helps local business, schools and homeowners save money. In addition, HVME educates shoppers as to the origins of their inventory, offers workshops illustrating end uses for their materials and encourages them to share information with others.
Mission of Exchange:
Hudson Valley Materials Exchange, an educational waste prevention organization,
fosters business and community development, art and culture, environmental
protection, and sustainable living through its services.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Variety (In 2004, HVME diverted over 2,000 tons of materials through its
member network of 300-members, which includes 8 school districts and 25
schools)
Business Model for Exchange:
Government Agency/Non-Governmental Organization Partnership (GNGO)
Collection of Fees:
Program dedicated to reducing wastes (RW) and fostering sustainability
(FSus); Charge for covering costs of exchanging products (CFP); and charge
for covering costs of operation (CFO)
Sources of Information:
Hudson Valley Materials Exchange Website:
http://hvmaterialsexchange.com
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Lower East Side Ecology Center
Contact Information for Exchange:
Christine Datz-Romero, Director
info@lescologycenter.org
P.O. Box 20488
New York, NY 10009
212-477-4022 (Tel) 212-420-0621 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.lesecologycenter.org
History & Background of Exchange:
Since 1987, New York City's Lower East Side Ecology Center (LESEC), a
grass-roots environmental not-for-profit organization, has provided New
Yorkers with a wide range of community based recycling and education programs.
LESEC, is well known for its "pay dirt"-rich compost made from
New York City residents' kitchen scraps, as well as for its diversity
of hands-on environmental education programs. Other projects have included
e-waste recycling events, advocacy for responsible solid waste management
practices in New York City, environmental education geared towards youth
on the Lower East Side, stewardship and advocacy for public open space,
and a working, mixed use waterfront. An example of the organization's
efforts was a project asking for working and non-working cell phones,
computers and other electronics at its Earth Day Take-back Days at Union
Square in Manhattan in 2003. A primary goal of the phone and e-waste drive
was to collect electronics that New York City residents no longer use
and would ordinarily throw out, and to inform residents that electronics
contain lots of heavy metals and other persistent and bio-accumulative
toxins. If they are disposed of in landfills and incinerators, these items
spread those pollutants and chemicals into the air and groundwater.
Working computers were refurbished at Per Scholas, a Bronx based not-for-profit, and sold at low cost to educational institutions and low-income families. Non-working or very old computers and televisions were safely disassembled according to State and Federal guidelines and recycled to the fullest extent. Working and non-working cell phones were collected and shipped to another not-for-profit, Charitable Recycling, which pays one dollar for every phone donated. Proceeds from the donated cell phones were given to the Lower East Side Ecology Center to help fund local, hands-on environmental education programs offered for free to public schoolchildren.
Accepted items include the following:Mission of Exchange:
Lower East Side Ecology Center (LESEC) is working to increase community
awareness, involvement, and activism through environmental education.
Goals & Objectives of Exchange:
One goal of this program is to reduce the amount of residential trash
exported out of the City daily. New Yorkers generate more than 11,000
tons of household trash every day. With no landfill of its own, the City
pays by the pound to have the trash containerized and transported to landfills
and incinerators outside the City. LESEC is one of eight community groups
contracted by INFORM and funded by the Department of Sanitation to provide
waste prevention outreach and education to New York City residents.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Variety (In 2004/05, LESEC diverted 60 tons/year of organics and 50 tons/year
of e-waste)
Business Model for Exchange:
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) designed to foster sustainability
(FSus)
Collection of Fees:
Public Service/Free Exchange (PSFE)
Sources of Information:
Lower East Side Ecology Center Website
http://www.lesecologycenter.org
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Maine Materials Exchange - M2X
Contact Information for Exchange:
Harold Arndt
HArndt@m2x.com
93 Maquoit Drive
Freeport, ME 04032
(Tel) 207-865-6621 (Tel) 207-865-6478 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.m2x.com
History & Background of Exchange:
The Maine Materials Exchange (M2X) was organized as a non-profit in 1995,
as an outgrowth of the Maine WasteCap Program and their waste minimization
assessments of the early 1990's. The Maine WasteCap Assessments demonstrated
that generally all industries had or generated materials and items periodically
which were no longer needed by that owner and that there was an opportunity
for continued reuse by a new or different owner. However, it was determined
that there were few, if any, avenues for exchanges between generators
and re-users. A task force of industry representatives from larger industries
with "Resource Recovery Programs" convened to organize the Maine
Materials Exchange and make available to all industries the services now
provided and stated in the mission.
Mission of Exchange:
M2X is a match-making service for companies, businesses, organizations
with excess materials and for companies, businesses, organizations and
individuals who can make productive use of those wastes, by-products and
materials. M2X was developed to link generators wishing to dispose of
"useful wastes" (they call it "STUFF") with those
who need or can utilize those materials.
Goals & Objectives of Exchange:
M2X is a free service designed to help Maine Businesses reuse materials
and find alternatives to throwing valuable materials into Maine landfills
and incinerators. Listings are for materials that are "available"
or materials that are "wanted". There is no fee to list a material,
either as "wanted" or as "available". M2X is a business
information clearinghouse that helps businesses reuse valuable materials
or wastes rather than dispose of them. The Website listings can assist
re-users in finding usable materials, or to assist generators in finding
a new user for materials no longer needed. For those paying to dispose
of materials that could be used by another business, or purchasing items
that other businesses are throwing away, the Maine Materials Exchange
can provide a needed service.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
An extremely wide Variety of materials for and from businesses are listed
in the database in both the "wanted" and the "available"
goods for exchange. Basically all materials and items are considered for
listing, but nothing that qualifies as Flammable or Hazardous, or is a
Bio-Hazard, is accepted into the M2X warehouse.
Business Model for Exchange:
Governmental/Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) partnership
Collection of Fees:
M2X operated on a variety of fee schedules depending on the involvement
of the exchange (CFP, CFO). Client-owned material is available at the
exchange as (1) no charge; (2) a negotiable price; (3) a fixed price;
or 4) an auctioned price, or (5) is being donated to M2X as a tax deductible
donation for redistribution via (1) or (2).
The financial proceeds are shared by both the listing organization and M2X from the "Materials Available" listings, which are successfully exchanged with negotiated prices or fixed prices, or are periodically auctioned. The percentages shared are pre-determined and published per the detailed Financial Consideration Table in Appendix F , located on the Maine Materials Exchange Website. For items listed as no charge or donations, which are successfully exchanged, M2X assesses the new users or owners a handling fee or a negotiated service fee. As a listing organization for materials "Wanted", it is agreed that a service fee for successful exchanges will be accessed by M2X, based on the guidelines outlined on the website.
Sources of Information:
Maine Materials Exchange Website
http://www.m2x.com
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Massachusetts Material Exchange
Contact Information for Exchange:
John Majercak, Center for Ecological Technology
johnm@cetonline.org
26 Market Street
Northampton, MA 01060
413-586-7350(Tel)
John Crisley, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Municipal Waste Reduction Program
John.Crisley@state.ma.us
617-556-1021 (Tel) 617-292-5778 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.materialsexchange.org
History & Background of Exchange:
The Massachusetts Materials Exchange was established in 2000, as a tool
for diverting usable materials from the waste stream. The Massachusetts
Materials Exchange has been established through public and private grants.
The support of participants is needed to ensure that this service continues.
Mission of Exchange:
The Massachusetts Materials Exchange connects businesses with
reusable materials with others that can use them.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
All materials (Moved over 2,000 tons of materials in four years; saved
participants more than $100,000 in avoided disposal and purchasing costs)
Business Model for Exchange:
Government Agency Program (GA)
Collection of Fees:
Charge Fee to Cover Costs of Operating Exchange (CFO); Program to Reduce
Waste (RW)
Other Relevant Information:
Materials commonly listed in our database include manufacturer's byproducts,
surplus stock, scrap and overrun material, used equipment, used office
furnishings, packaging and transport materials. The Massachusetts Materials
Exchange links businesses through its online database, and by actively
researching and pursuing reuse and recycling options. Participants arrange
for shipping and take possession of the materials themselves.
Participants are asked to contribute a portion of the savings achieved by using the Materials Exchange. Participants determine the amount to contribute, typically 20% of their savings or more. You can call us to discuss this percentage as it pertains to your particular situation. Savings for your business may include: avoided disposal costs, revenues from the sale of materials, purchasing savings, savings in staff costs due to saved time, avoided storage costs, or avoided administrative costs.
Sources of Information:
Massachusetts Materials Exchange Website
http://www.materialsexchange.org
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Materials for the Arts
Contact Information for Exchange:
Harriet Taub, Director
htaub@mfta.org
Robert Bangiola, Deputy Director
info@mfta.org
33-00 Northern Boulevard
Long Island City, NY 11101
718-729-3001 (Tel) 718-729-3941 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.mfta.org
History & Background of Exchange:
Materials for the Arts (MFTA) was created in 1978 when an artist named
Angela Fremont, working at the Arsenal in Central Park heard that the
Central Park Zoo needed a refrigerator to hold medicine for the animals.
A call to a local radio station brought forth a flurry of calls with donations.
During the early 1980's MFTA had space in the basement of a public school
(PS-1) Institute for Contemporary Art. Currently, MFTA occupies a 25,000
square foot loft in the Center Building, and operates with a staff of
12. This building brings its own sense of history. Originally an automobile
factory for the Ford Motor Company, the Center Building provides MFT with
passenger and freight elevators and a separate loading dock for use by
recipients and donors. Outside the glass wall in the MFTA warehouse are
the remnants of an assembly line, echoing the building's industrial past.
The MFTA warehouse is able to provide its users with paints and thousands
of feet of floor space for furniture and props. Recipients wind up taking
more per visit since the array of supplies is vast and interesting.
MFTA provides over 3,000 arts and cultural organizations and NYC public schools with the materials they need to prosper and endure. MFTA gathers materials from companies that no longer need them, and distributes them to artists and educators that do, thus diverting hundreds of tons of valuable resources from NYC's waste stream.
Located near six major subway lines means we are conveniently located for many of our donors and recipients. In fact, we are now finding that organizations are able to shop, and explore the arts community in Long Island City while paying a visit to the MFTA warehouse.
Waste Management, Inc. and Materials for the Arts have come together on a joint project, in which WMI has provided a professional, fully licensed truck driver once a week to help in pickups from donors.
Mission of Exchange:
Materials for the Arts (MFTA) helps artists realize their visions, provides
students with a richer educational experience, and offers businesses a
simple and efficient way to enhance the cultural life of their city.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Variety, constantly changing (including furniture, household materials,
electronics, home decorating materials, office supplies); in 2004, MFTA
diverted 540 tons of reusable materials.
Business Model for Exchange:
NGO (Non-Governmental Organization)
Collection of Fees:
PSFE (Recipient pays the cost of, or provides for, delivery of exchange
items)
An interactive website http://www.MFTA.org includes registration forms for both Recipients and Donors and an online Direct Donations program available to registered groups, expanding the kinds of goods and services we can provide to all our recipients. Direct Donation items are those that cannot be taken into our warehouse because of size or quantity restrictions. These items include pianos, theater seats, stoves, refrigerators, etc.
When recipients shop at their warehouse, they essentially take hundreds of tons of waste from the City sanitation system, and transform it into art. They teach children, invigorate museums, and delight audiences throughout the City. MFTA also offers professional development workshops to train people on the value and importance of reuse.
Sources of Information:
Materials for the Arts Webpage
http://www.mfta.org
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Materials Resource Center
Contact Information for Exchange:
Julie Sullivan, Executive Director
arclink@juno.com
1523 Lincoln Avenue
Holbrook, NY 11741
631-580-7290 (Tel) 631-580-7292 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.craftmaterialsresource.com
History & Background of Exchange:
Materials Resource Center (MRC) operates a public reuse center on Long
Island that collects a wide range of materials from local businesses and
distributes them as non-traditional arts supplies to artists and educators.
Mission of Exchange:
The Materials Resource Center (MRC) is committed to improving the environment
and creating economic opportunity by conducting research, and developing
and applying waste reduction strategies that lead to conservation of natural
resources and materials.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Variety (In 2004, MRC diverted around 100 tons/year of commercial and
industrial scrap and surplus)
Business Model for Exchange:
NGO (Non-governmental Organization)
Collection of Fees:
PSFE (Public Service/Free Exchange)
Sources of Information:
Materials Resource Center Website
http://www.craftmaterialsresource.com
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
New Hampshire Waste Cap Resource Conservation Network (New Hampshire Materials
Exchange -NHME)
Contact Information for Exchange:
Mark Toussaint
mtoussaint@wastecapnh.org
WasteCap of New Hampshire
122 N. Main Street
Concord, NH 03301
603-224-1517 (Tel) 603-224-2872 (Fax)
Website for Exchange (if any):
http://www.wastecapnh.org/nhme/
History & Background of Exchange:
The NHME (a service of the WasteCap Resource Conservation Network), has
about 300 listings, managed with a small staff. WasteCap has not received
specific funding for the exchange for several years. The program is run
from corporate contributes to the WasteCap program. The program is almost
entirely automated, and is hosted free of charge by GZA GeoEnvironmental,
Inc.
Mission of Exchange:
The WasteCap Resource Conservation Network (ReCoN) is an initiative of
the Business & Industry Association of New Hampshire.
The goal is to help businesses save money and conserve natural resources
by providing free, confidential assistance in reducing solid waste, conserving
energy and water, and preventing pollution.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Variety for business to business exchange.
Business Model for Exchange:
NGO (Non-governmental organization)
Collection of Fees:
CFP (Charge for exchanging products)
Funding comes from corporate sponsors.
Other Relevant Material:
Materials exchange information is disseminated in three ways: (1) through
the Web site with e-mail links to listers when possible, links to other
materials exchanges nationwide, and information about WasteCap's free,
confidential waste reduction services; (2) a quarterly electronic newsletter;
and (3) an e-mail list serve whereby users sign up to receive current
information on exchange opportunities (for information, contact exchange@wastecapnh.org.
Sources of Information:
New Hampshire Materials Exchange Website:
http://www.wastecapnh.org
New York City Materials Exchange Roundtable (November 1997)
http://cwmi.css.cornell.edu/WastRed/MatExch.html#anchor9472
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
New York Wa$te Match, a Program of the Industrial and Technology Assistance
Corporation (ITAC)
Contact Information for Exchange:
Stefanie Feldman, Program Director
sfeldman@itac.org
info@wastematch.org
ITAC
253 Broadway
New York, NY 10007
212-442-5219 (Tel) 212-442-4567 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.wastematch.org
History & Background of Exchange:
New York Wa$teMatch was launched in 1997 by the NYC Department of Sanitation
(DOS), in partnership with the City University of New York (CUNY). Additional
program support is provided by the Empire State Economic Development Corporation.
NY Wa$teMatch helps businesses save money by providing an online Materials Exchange and brokering service for industrial scraps, packaging, and other items that are potentially reusable, but for which there are not well-established recycling markets. While reuse is the primary objective, some transactions involve recycling when reuse outlets are not available.
NY Wa$teMatch's materials management services, in addition to their education and research projects, merge environmental responsibility with sound business practices. Their main activities are online materials exchange, waste assessment, brokering, technical assistance, research and development.
Mission of Exchange:
To foster environmentally sound economic development through innovative
waste reduction and resource recovery strategies.
Goals & Objectives of Exchange:
(1) Increase local infrastructure for regional waste disposal capacity
(By helping businesses reduce the overall amount of waste generated that
needs to be moved through the City's limited transfer station capacity
and reducing truck trips of exported waste, NY Wa$teMatch has a positive
impact on the environment); (2) Develop better public awareness about
the benefits and opportunities for waste reduction and reuse.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
NY Wa$teMatch works primarily with NYC businesses and industrial firms.
However, only hazardous materials and hazardous wastes are prohibited
from the Materials Exchange. (In 2004, NY Wa$teMatch diverted approximately
4,000 tons of wastes and saved area businesses thousands of dollars in
avoided disposal costs).
Business Model for Exchange:
GNGO (Government/ Non-governmental Organization Partnership)
Independent nonprofit economic development organization, funded primarily
by government funds.
Collection of Fees:
Gain-sharing Fees for Technical Assistance (CFP); Public Service,
Materials Exchange is donation-based (PSFE); Program to Reduce Volume
of Wastes (RW).
Sources of Information:
New York Wa$teMatch website
http://www.wastematch.org
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
New York City Materials Exchange Roundtable, November 1997
http://cwmi.css.cornel.edu/WastRed/MatlExch.html#anchor9472
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
PENCIL
Contact Information for Exchange:
Jesse Determann, Donor Programs & Partnership Associate
jesse@pencil.org
30 West 26th Street, 5th Floor
New York, NY 10010
646-638-0565 (Tel) 646-638-0585 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.thepencilbox.org
History & Background of Exchange:
Public Education Needs Civic Involvement in Learning (PENCIL) was founded
in 1995 to develop civic involvement in New York City public education
in order to improve student achievement. Its flagship program, Principal
For A Day, pairs thousands of New Yorkers from the private sector with
the city's schools and enhances the learning environment of students in
New York City public schools. The Pencil Box is a not for profit website
where individuals and businesses can post gently used goods on the Web
for New York City public schools to obtain through donations. A broad
range of items can be posted on the site for the review of the City's
public schools. If a school is interested in a particular item, they are
required to fill out a form in order to contact the donor.
These two programs, The Pencil Box, and Principal For A Day, along with other PENCIL programs, foster hundreds of long-term partnerships with schools, generate millions of dollars worth of donations of cash, goods, and services for schools and school districts, and act as a vehicle through which the city's private sector advocates for educational reform. PENCIL's programs continue to serve as national and international models of private sector engagement in public education.
Mission of Exchange:
The mission of The PENCIL Box is to provide New York City public schools
material support through the donation of goods that would be unavailable
due to budgetary constraints, or goods that supplement the schools' own
resources to improve student achievement.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Any materials suitable for the school environment including
books, furniture, computers, art supplies, computers, sports equipment,
science equipment, and other educational tools (In 2004, The Pencil Box
diverted tons of reusable materials from landfills and assisted hundreds
of NYC public schools).
Business Model for Exchange:
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)
Collection of Fees:
Public Service/Free Exchange (PSFE)
Sources of Information:
The Pencil Box Website:
http://www.thepencilbox.org/
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Per Scholas, Inc.
Contact Information for Exchange:
Mike Capobianco
mcapobianco@perscholas.org
1231 Lafayette Avenue
Bronx, NY 10474
718-772-0655 (Tel) 718-991-0414 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.perscholas.org
History & Background of Exchange:
Per Scholas (PSI), located in the South Bronx, was founded in 1995 with
the help of a consortium of foundations and corporations, and was originally
dedicated to providing refurbished computers to schools. Today, Per Scholas
has expanded their offerings of refurbished computers to the residential
market as well. The computers are rebuilt by a dedicated staff and resold
to schools and deserving individuals at a very low and affordable price.
Per Scholas also offers A+ computer training courses to students. To facilitate
the training program and offering of refurbished computers they also operate
an EPA-certified, full service technology recycling facility. Located
in the Bronx, NY, the facility recycles computers that cannot be refurbished,
further diverting harmful waste from landfills.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Computers and computer peripherals, including printers, servers, hubs,
copiers, monitors, laptops, and other storage devices. (In 2004, Per Scholas
recycled over 60,000 pieces of equipment).
Business Model for Exchange:
NGO (Non-governmental Organization)
Collection of Fees:
CFP (Charge for covering costs of exchanging products); CFO (Charge for
covering costs of operation). In most cases Per Scholas charges a fee
for the pick-up, removal, disposition, and certification of recycled equipment.
Fees vary depending on type of entity.
Sources of Information:
Per Scholas Website
http://www.perscholas.org/index.html
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
The ReCONNstruction Center
Contact Information for Exchange:
Paula Flack
paulajflack@yahoo.com
General Information
info@reconnstructioncenter.org
The ReCONNstruction Center
230 South Street
New Britain, CT 06051
(860) 597-3390 (Tel)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.reconnstructioncenter.org/about.html#contact
History & Background of Exchange:
Selling quality pre-owned items is as old as common sense. Yankee frugality
and global knowledge came together and spawned the concept of creating
a used building materials store here in Connecticut. John Powers, a Connecticut
native, had seen building materials being reused all over the U.S. and
abroad. Wanting his own community to have the same opportunity, he connected
with people who shared his practical vision. Together, they founded The
ReCONNstruction Center in 2003.
The name of the ReCONNstruction Center came to light after thinking about what our goals were and where we were going to be located. The "Re" stands for Reuse and Recycle; CONN is an abbreviation for the state of Connecticut, in which we are incorporated; and "reconstruct" means to construct again. Put it all together, and the term "ReCONNstruction" symbolizes the rebirth of a building that incorporates used materials.
The ReCONNstruction Center functions similarly to a Salvation Army thrift shop, except that instead of accepting clothing and household goods, the Center accepts donations of unwanted, but perfectly usable building materials. These materials are inventoried, priced, and displayed at the store. Each donor receives a receipt with a description of the donated materials that can be used to claim a tax deduction.
Recently, The ReCONNstruction Center won Ford Motor Company's "Best Business Plan Contest," surpassing 1,200 other contestants from across the country. The contest was judged by a panel of former and current business owners, showing that folks who have been in business themselves think that The ReCONNstruction Center has a great chance at success. The cash award, used to implement our mission, represents a prestigious honor that will help to strengthen other grant applications.
The ReCONNstruction Center is open to the general public and is staffed by paid employees and volunteers.
Mission of Exchange:
The ReCONNstruction Center is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Our
mission is to promote environmental and social sustainability by salvaging
unwanted, but perfectly good building materials, and reselling them at
prices affordable to the average wage earner, and to support these activities
specifically in urban areas, recognizing these locations as essential
to the long term sustainability of the economy and culture.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Construction Materials
Business Model for Exchange:
NGO (Non-governmental Organization)
Collection of Fees:
Charge to cover costs of exchanging products (CFP); Charge to cover costs
of operation (CFO). Retail sales; Public Service (PS).
Sources of Information:
ReCONNstruction Center Website
http://www.reconnstructioncenter.org
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Recycle-a-Bicycle
Contact Information for Exchange:
Karen Overton, Executive Director
koverton@recycleabicycle.org
Dumbo Shop
55 Washington Street, between Front and Water Streets
Brooklyn, NY 11201
718-858-2972 (Tel)
East Village Shop
75 Avenue C, between Fifth and Sixth Streets
New York, NY 10009
212-475-1655 (Tel)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.recycleabicycle.org
History & Background of Exchange:
Recycle-A-Bicycle (RAB) was launched as a pilot program in the summer
of 1994, via a partnership of Transportation Alternatives (a NYC bicycle
and pedestrian advocacy group), the Children's Aid Society, New York City
Intermediate School 218 (IS-218), and Manhattan Borough President Ruth
Messinger. The immediate result was the establishment of a bicycle refurbishing
workshop in an unused industrial arts room in IS 218, in upper Manhattan's
Washington Heights neighborhood. After one season, the program was incorporated
into the school's curriculum and offered by the NYC Board of Education
as an industrial arts class.
Since that time, RAB has continued to grow and diversify. In 1995, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency funded a grant to develop a "how-to" book for replicating Recycle-A-Bicycle across the U.S. Tools for Life was published later that year to national acclaim, and the manual has been shared with over 3,000 organizations across the country.
In 1996, the Henry Street Settlement initiated a summer youth employment program that has grown into a year round training initiative at the Dumbo Training Center. In addition to the basic curriculum, students learn business concepts as related to a bike shop: sales, customer service, marketing, and inventory management. This partnership has resulted in the opening of two retail shops,
Recycle-A-Bicycle is now an independent non-profit organization dedicated to youth development, environmental education and job training program. RAB is the largest youth training program of its type in the country and it has touched almost a thousand young people during its existence. The bicycle maintenance and repair workshops are offered to youth between the ages of 10-18. Class discussion places the mechanical work in the context of the environmental benefits of recycling and bicycle transportation. At some sites, it also introduces students to the practical aspects of running a small business. Additionally, kids have the opportunity to participate in a sweat-equity "Earn-A-Bike" program. Refurbished bikes in excess of those earned by participating children are donated to community organizations that run outdoor youth projects or sold to increase revenue.
RAB offers four in-school programs, three ride clubs, and two retail stores, located in the East Village (Manhattan) and Dumbo (Brooklyn), where RAB graduates are employed, that sell a wide range of refurbished bicycles. Each site has a co-sponsoring organization already active in the community that has provided support.
Recently, Bike New York funded the publication of One Revolution at a Time: A Guide to Starting and Running Youth Bike Ride Clubs, a 48-page illustrated manual, focused on RAB's lessons gleaned from many years of organizing bike trips for young people.
Each summer, Recycle-A-Bicycle works in partnership with Green Map Systems to involve youth in an environmental education project. Students are "hired" as environmental investigators and must research themes such as waste management, alternative transportation, air pollution, and the relevance of community gardens. Students visit government agencies, businesses, non-profits, and libraries to gather information. Field trips are taken by bike and each student records drawings and findings in a journal. At the end of the summer, the students' work culminates into a map that is then distributed in the neighborhood. The project is funded by the NYC Citizens Committee.
Mission of Exchange:
Recycle-A-Bicycle refurbishes donated bikes and sells them at our retail
locations. It is an innovative, fun, youth training initiative that has
taken root in New York City public schools and respected after-school
youth programs. RAB is a hands-on way to promote everyday bicycle use,
learn bicycle mechanics, interact with positive, forward-thinking NYC
youth, and find that city bike you need.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Bicycles (In 2004, RAB diverted 20 tons of bicycles and related items,
and provided hundreds of kids with marketable skills).
Business Model for Exchange:
NGO (Non-governmental Organization)
Collection of Fees:
PS (Public Service); RW (Reduce volume of wastes); CFO (Charge to cover
costs of operation); CFP (Charge to cover costs of exchanging products).
Bicycles are donated, repaired, and sold; training is free.
Other Relevant Information:
RAB maintains liaison training programs with a number of other non-profit
organizations and youth training centers. RAB has special summer programs,
including the "Peace Quilt Project" from Summer 2004. Recycle-A-Bicycle
at IS-90 was awarded the 2004 Neighborhood Environmental Intern Program
by Citizens for NYC.
Sources of Information:
Recycle-A-Bicycle Website
http://www.recycleabicycle.org
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
ResourceXchange of Rhode Island
Contact Information for Exchange:
Paul A. Caccia, Waste Prevention Manager
paulc@rirrc.org
Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation
65 Shun Pike
Johnston, RI 02919-4512
401-942-1430, x115 (Tel) 401-942-0239 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.resourcexchange.org
History & Background of Exchange:
The Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation, a state agency
dedicated to providing the public with environmentally sound programs
and facilities to manage solid waste, has developed two online materials
exchanges. The Rhode Island ResourceXchange is focused on matching businesses,
educational institutions, nonprofits, and government agencies. The FreeMarketRI,
in partnership with Eureka Recycling, from Minneapolis, MN, provides services
to Rhode Island homeowners and individual consumers.
The ResourceXchange website, developed in partnership with the Chafee Center for International Business at Bryant University, provides a listing service for businesses, educational institutions, non-profit organizations, and government agencies for free exchange of resources.
The website for homeowners and individual consumers - FreeMarket RI (Available at http://www.freemarketri.org ) is a listing service for residents who want to give or get free reusable goods for the home, garage, and garden, in an attempt to reduce the amount of these goods being discarded into the Rhode Island Central Landfill.
Mission of Exchange:
Businesses, schools, colleges, nonprofits and government agencies can
exchange resources free online.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Variety of materials (ResourceXchange, the business exchange, has provided
the opportunity for approximately 500 businesses to divert 687,000 pounds
of reusable things in 2004-2005).
Business Model for Exchange:
Government agency program (GA)
Collection of Fees:
PSFE (Public service/ free exchange); Program for Reducing the Volume
of Waste (RW)
Sources of Information:
ResourceXchange Website:
http://www.resourcexchange.org
Free Market RI Website
http://www.freemarketri.org
Article in Providence Sunday Journal, April 17, 2005
Zuckerman, Faye B. 2005. "Recycle, Reuse, Freecycle." Providence
Sunday Journal, LIFESTYLES, April 17, 2005, pp 7-9.
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
ReStore Home Improvement Center (Massachusetts)
Contact Information for Exchange:
John Grossman, Manager
johng@cetonline.org
250 Albany Street
Springfield, MA 01105
413-788-6900 (Tel)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.restoreonline.org
History & Background of Exchange:
The ReStore was founded in 2001 in an underused property in Springfield.
Two years later it tripled its size by expanding to another building next
door. In 2004, the ReStore began offering green demolition, or deconstruction,
services.
Mission of Exchange:
ReStore's mission is to reuse valuable materials, make home improvement
affordable for more people, and to create local jobs and provide job training.
The ReStore received grant funding to help cover costs during the first
few years of operations. Our goal is to make the ReStore self-sustaining
through the income created through our sales, which it has been since
its third year of operations.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Used and surplus building materials - cabinets, windows, doors, lighting,
plumbing, flooring, and more.
Business Model for Exchange:
For profit business (FPB); reduce volume of wastes (RW).
Collection of Fees:
Retail sales, including charges for operations and goods (CFP, CFO)
Other Relevant Information:
The ReStore accepts donations of quality but unwanted home improvement
materials and sells them to the public at low prices in a convenient retail
setting.
The ReStore's inventory includes used and salvaged materials and surplus stock from the building industry. Items are accepted from homeowners, contractors, manufacturers, retailers, and municipal collection centers.
Sources of Information:
ReStore Home Improvement Website
http://www.restoreonline.org
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
ReTech, Inc.
Contact Information for Exchange:
Erik Wood, President
erik@retechkids.org
165 East 36th Street
New York, NY 10016
917-686-6190 (Tel) 212-679-8490 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.retechkids.org
History & Background of Exchange:
ReTech is an art form developed by New York artist Erik Wood, using re-purposed
technology and other non-traditional and contemporary materials. Through
the making of art and its public display, the ReTech Art Program stretches
and strengthens creative thinking, promotes self-esteem, and encourages
environmental responsibility.
Erik Wood is a working New York artist and parent. He has been very active for many years in his children's (public) schools, and his community. He began sharing his unique knowledge and skills with children in his first ReTech workshop in January 2001. In March 2001, following a workshop and exhibit at the Kips Bay Branch of the New York Public Library, Erik Wood's efforts were described in a full page article in the New York Daily News, and he was named New York 1's "New Yorker of the Week."
Through art workshops ReTech allows children, the elderly, and corporate clients have fun discovering and nurturing their creativity and problem-solving abilities. In turn, these workshops help to enlighten and energize people about the environment and the benefits of reuse and waste prevention. ReTech also facilitates art shows in public spaces, building students' self-confidence and spreading the reuse message that will help make their workshops available to all.
Since May 2001, Erik Wood has worked with over 2,000 three- and four-year-olds in Universal Pre-Kindergarten programs in New York City, and pieces of the children's work were shown at The National Arts Club in November 2001.
Mission of Exchange:
Not-for-profit organization, a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) corporation, which
focuses on recycled technology in art, serving NYC public schools and
libraries. The goals of ReTech, Inc. include the following: promote ReTech
styled art; encourage cooperation among artists, teachers, students and
others; develop community appreciation of the arts by producing exhibitions;
spread the recycling message and environmental appreciation by using recycled
technology in the creation of ReTech art; expose individuals and groups
of all ages to art; encourage individuals and groups of all ages to develop
their artistic skills and afford them an opportunity to display work they
have created; develop self-esteem, and personal and community responsibility
using art; fund these programs by soliciting contributions of money and
services from groups, institutions, and organizations, and by obtaining
grants from government, foundation and/or other public or quasi-public
agencies.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Art materials (In 2004, ReTech utilized tons of reusable materials as
part of 70 workshops; taught 1800 students the values of developing their
own creative expression as well as the value of rethinking the potential
of materials they once thought of as waste).
Business Model for Exchange:
NGO (Non-Governmental Organization)
Collection of Fees:
PSFE (Public Service/ Free Exchange). Dependent upon donations of materials
and money, and procurement of grants.
Other Relevant Information:
Art B4 5 refers to the incredible artwork being produced in the ReTech
Art Program by three- and four-year olds. The capacity of preschool aged
children to use and integrate a variety of materials in creating art objects
is vast and deep. As Erik Wood, artist/instructor and founder of the ReTech
Art Program, has said, "I don't teach art-what the children don't
know. Rather I encourage them to express themselves by using an art form
that has a rich variety of tools and materials from which to choose..."
The work has been heralded by parents, teachers, art educators and art
critics alike, and is representative of activities that are available
to children in quality preschool programs. It verifies the research on
brain development and underscores the great importance of early education.
Sources of Information:
ReTech, Inc. Website
http://www.retechkids.org
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Set Recycling Hotline
Contact Information for Exchange:
Julia Rubin, Program Director
setrecyclinghotline@yahoo.com
212-673-6343 (Tel)
Website for Exchange:
None listed.
History & Background of Exchange:
The Set Recycling Hotline (SRH), a program of Performing Arts Resource,
is an innovative means of encouraging the reuse of theatrical resources.
Companies and individuals in the performing arts, television, and film
industries wanting to dispose of scenic elements such as flats, platforms,
props, theatrical equipment such as audio/video and lighting, and raw
materials such as lumber, can call the Set Recycling Hotline to list their
items as available for donation. Non-profits interested in obtaining such
items, free-of-charge, can call SRH to register their needs and acquire
information on the listed items.
Mission of Exchange:
The Set Recycling Hotline is dedicated to the concept of diverting reusable
theatrical resources from the landfill, while benefiting NYC's non-profit
theatre community at the same time.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Theatrical equipment, scenery, props, raw materials, and supplies (In
2004, SRH diverted over a ton of materials from the landfills and assisted
nearly a hundred nonprofits in acquiring items necessary for NYC's non-profit
theatre community to thrive).
Business Model for Exchange:
NGO (Non-governmental Organization)
Collection of Fees:
Public Service/ Free Exchange (PSFE). All services are free
of charge.
Sources of Information:
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Storehouse NY
Contact Information for Exchange:
Luis Jimenez, Director
lujimene@worldvision.org
90 East 136th Street
Bronx, NY 10454
718-292-5600 (Tel) 718-292-5850 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.worldvision.org/newyork
History & Background of Exchange:
Since 1996, Storehouse NY (SHNY) has been collecting a wide variety of
new and surplus materials, such as clothing, building materials, school
and office furniture, and educational materials from regional businesses,
then distributing them free-of-charge to community partners working with
children and families. The community store helps meet basic needs for
children and families by offering donated, high-quality goods to revitalize
neighborhoods and sustain families for a hope-filled future. Local churches,
schools, and community groups distribute the items to families in need.
Mission of Exchange:
Storehouse NY (SHNY), program of the Christian relief and development
organization, World Vision, is dedicated to helping children and their
communities reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty.
As part of the larger organizational mission, the Storehouse serves the
poor in the NYC metro area, regardless of a person's religion, race, ethnicity,
or gender.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Variety (In 2004, SHNY diverted around 800 tons of reusable materials
to over 120,000 families, 75,000 students, and 300 teachers in New York
City; in 2003, about 1.2 million people received warm clothing, building
supplies, or school supplies through the Storehouse.)
Business Model for Exchange:
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO).
Collection of Fees:
Public Service/ Free Exchange (PSFE).
Other Relevant Information:
Storehouse NY tries to meet the following objectives: (a) providing families
with clothing, toys, household goods, and personal care items; (b) offering
school supplies for teachers in low-income schools, from pencils and paper
to books and backpacks; (c) supplying building materials to renovate apartments
and homes into safe, healthy living spaces for families; and (d) partnering
with corporations, which benefit from additional tax deductions, increased
warehouse space, and positive public relations by donating product.
Sources of Information:
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Tools for Schools
Contact Information for Exchange:
Janice Hepburn, Director
Tools4schools@earthlink.net
1916 Park Avenue, Room 504
New York, NY 10037
646-548-9675 (Tel) 646-548-9752 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.toolsforschoolssolutions.org
History & Background of Exchange:
In 1992, a one-time company initiative was cultivated among about 4000
employees for recycling office supplies, moving from a nascent concept
to a fully-functional recycling program in 1993, based on 20 volunteers
and geared toward the redistribution of office supplies. In 2000 the founder,
Janice Hepburn, began working on a full-time basis to address communities
in need, creating Tools 4 Schools, a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization,
dependent on grants and donations for funding. The organization was set
up to facilitate recycling office material and getting it into schools.
Tools for Schools collects and redistributes donated office furniture and equipment, accepting chairs, conference tables, sofas, desks, bookcases, file cabinets, computers, fax machines, scanners, and more, then offers these essential materials to organizations working on tight budgets, including schools and non-profits.
Mission of Exchange:Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Office Equipment and Furnishings (In 2004, TFS diverted around 200 tons
of these items from disposal in landfills.)
Business Model for Exchange:
NGO (Non-Governmental Organization)
Collection of Fees:
Charge for covering the costs of exchanging products (CFP); Public Service
(PS). Donation for arranging pickup.
Other Relevant Information:
Tools 4 Schools (and other Non-Profits) works to identify and evaluate
the needs for furniture, computers, and supplies, to secure donations
of surplus materials from corporations, and to distribute the items to
the organizations in need.
We see the "idle assets" of a business as a "tool" to create pathways to discover new skills and knowledge. We train people to manage our day-to-day operations thereby offering a hands-on experience in an office environment. They experience extensive client contact over the phone and in person, filing, computer work in Word and Excel, and recordkeeping.
School readiness, teen pregnancy and substance abuse are areas that are addressed through increasing self-esteem, communication skills and pride in one's work.
Sources of Information:
Tools for Schools Website:
http://www.toolsforschoolssolutions.org
Reuse Alliance Member Profiles (March 2005)
http://www.reusealliance.net
INFORMATION CARD
Name of Materials Exchange:
Vermont Business Materials Exchange
Contact Information for Exchange:
Carolyn Grodinsky, Waste Prevention Coordinator
carolyn.grodinsky@state.vt.us
Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
Department of Environmental Conservation
Waste Division, Waste Prevention Section
103 South Main Street, West Office Building
Waterbury, VT 05671-0404
802-241-3477 (Tel) 802-241-3296 (Fax)
The Vermont Business Materials Exchange
manager@VBMX.org
1580 Barber Pond Road
Pownal, VT 05261
802-823-9399; 800-895-1930 (Tel) 802-823-5228 (Fax)
Website for Exchange:
http://www.vbmx.org
History & Background of Exchange:
Two divisions within the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC),
the Environmental Assistance Division (EAD) and the Waste Management Division
(WM) plan and manage the state waste reduction programs. The Recycling
Section, within the Waste Management Division, works with state agencies,
businesses, municipalities and others to identify effective and economical
ways to reduce, reuse, and recycle wastes. The Solid Waste Program oversees
laws, rules, policies, and planning related to solid waste management
in the state, and also provides solid waste technical and financial assistance
to towns and solid waste districts. The Environmental Assistance Division
provides a non-regulatory focus, one of technical assistance and education,
working with businesses, communities, state agencies, and others to identify
effective and economical ways to reduce waste at the source, or to recycle
waste once it's generated in order to avoid waste treatment and disposal
costs and to safeguard human health and the environment.
The Vermont Business Materials Exchange (VBMX) was developed in conjunction with Vermont's source reduction programs. Sponsored by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, the VBMX maintains a database of available and wanted materials, emphasizing that "waste is a misplaced resource." Monthly publication of featured listings by the Vermont Business Magazine helps to promote usage of the Exchange. Sponsors of the Website have included Internet Support Service, Inc. (present), and the American Plastics Council (past).
Mission of Exchange:
The Vermont Business Materials Exchange (VBMX) is a free service that
seeks to reduce waste by promoting the exchange of reusable commercial
materials. Through VBMX, companies with surplus or by-product materials
connect with other businesses or individuals who can reuse these materials
productively. While businesses save money on disposal fees, they also
reduce their impact on the environment.
Types of Materials Handled by Exchange:
Variety of Commercial Materials (At present, there are more than 600 active
listings, and the exchange is rapidly growing; going forward, interactive
and dynamic reporting of Exchange statistics will include tracking of
Website activity)
Business Model for Exchange:
GNGO (Government/ Non-Governmental Organization Partnership)
Government contract issued for management, with bid every two years. Most
funding provided by contractor, with additional in-kind services.
Collection of Fees:
PSFE (Public Service/ Free Exchange); RW (Waste Reduction Program).
Presently, free service; membership required, but plans exist to begin
charging for "services" listings, and possibly charging fees
for listings on the exchange.
Other Relevant Information:
Plans for Fall 2005: Development of audio and video PSAs about the exchange.
Plans for FY 2005-2006: Distribution of audio and video PSAs of the exchange;
speaking tour at Rotary Clubs and other business and trade organizations.
Sources of Information:
Vermont Business Materials Exchange Website:
http://www.vbmex.org
| Name of Exchange | Location | Contact Person |
| Build it Green! NYC | Queens, NY |
718-777-0132 |
| City Harvest | New York City, NY |
917-351-8755 |
| FreemarketRI | Johnston, RI |
401-942-1430x115 |
| Furnish a Future | Brooklyn, NY |
718-875-5353 |
| Hudson Valley Materials Exchange | New Windsor, NY |
845-567-1445 |
| Lower East Side Ecology Center | New York City, NY |
212-477-4022 |
| Maine Materials Exchange | Freeport, ME |
207-865-6621 |
| Massachusetts Materials Exchange | Northamptom, MA |
413-586-7350 |
| Materials For The Arts | Long Island City, NY |
718-729-3001 |
| Materials Resource Center | Holbrook, NY |
631-580-7290 |
| NH Materials Exchange | Concord, NH |
603-224-1517 |
| NY Wa$teMatch | New York City, NY |
212-442-5219 |
| PENCIL | New York City, NY |
646-638-0565 |
| Per Scholas, Inc. | Bronx, NY |
718-772-0655 |
| ReCONNstruction Center | New Britain, CT |
860-597-3390 |
| Recycle-a-Bicycle | Brooklyn, NY |
718-858-2972 |
| ResourceXchange | Johnston, RI |
401-942-1430x115 |
| Restore Home Improvement Ctr. | Springfield, MA |
413-788-6900 |
| ReTech Inc. | New York City, NY |
917-686-6190 |
| Set Recycling Hotline | New York City, NY |
212-673-6343 |
| StoreHouse | Bronx, NY |
718-282-5600 |
| Tools For Schools | New York City, NY |
646-548-9675 |
| VT Business Materials Exchange | Pownal, VT |
802-241-3477 |
APPENDIX III: SAMPLE COMPUTER-GENERATED BROCHURES
Brochures can easily be created with Microsoft software, e.g., using Publisher, or even Word (set up text in columns). One can import photographs, cartoons, or artist's sketches to illustrate the brochures or pamphlets. A variety of paper choices can be purchased from paper suppliers at a reasonable cost (the paper comes prefolded and is easy to fold after printing. We have provided a few examples of what can be done, but in reality, the choices are endless. The best advantage to creating your own marketing materials is that you can print small amounts as needed, and change the content whenever desirable. If your office does not have a color printer, commercial copy centers like Staples or Kinko's will usually print small jobs directly from disk on the paper of your choice. For Exchanges that need large quantities of advertising materials or informational brochures, then using a commercial printer may be more desirable, although usually more expensive. We have included two environmentally oriented brochures as samples.
Select Brochure to View a Larger Version
![]() |
![]() |
| Center for Sustainable Business Practices | |
![]() |
![]() |
| LIPA Green Choice Program | |
APPENDIX IV: SAMPLE PRESS RELEASES
SAMPLE NEWS STORY
Bushwick Observer, May 2001 (Condensed version)
"Non-Profit Tools for Schools Seeks Bushwick Volunteers"
In the wake of budget cutbacks, members of Tools for Schools are hastening to assure teachers in need that there is still a place in the neighborhood where they can receive supplies.
Tools for Schools (TFS) is a non-profit organization founded in 1993 by Janice Hepburn was working for a Fortune 500 corporation...setting up a network within the company to collect material that would otherwise have been thrown away and completely wasted...By this time, Ms. Hepburn saw the potential value not only of recycling office material but of getting it into schools. After seriously considering her options and risks, she left her job..."Teachers have compromised themselves into believing this is how it has to be, that insufficient chairs, and broken file cabinets are the norm," said Ms. Hepburn. "We're changing that."
TFS has provided the valuable service of providing used office furniture and computers to schools and not-for-profit organizations in need. While the program has expanded and changed over the years, its core mission has remained the same, to create constructive alternatives to throwing out excess reusables...
Last Fall,...Public School 145 effectively coordinated the donation of 16 file cabinets on a Saturday. With the help of volunteers, all files were put in place and it was business as usual on Monday. Tools for Schools has also helped PS 45, PS 106, IS 111, PS 123, PS 145, PS 151, IS 383, and PS 384 (in this particular community).
As a not-for-profit organization the program relies on donations and fundraisers to keep its doors open and volunteers to get the job done...To volunteer or for more information about the program, call (718) 836 7129.
Samples of different formats used for press releases are included in
the following pages, including one prepared by the National Recycling
Coalition in conjunction with a collaborative project, one prepared by
the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, and a template that can be utilized
with the Exchange's letterhead. For detailed instructions on how to prepare
and distribute a press release, see The Zero Waste website (http://www.grrn.org/zerowaste/kit/event/press_release.html).
The website also links to some additional sample press releases.
News Release For Immediate Release National Recycling Coalition Tel: (202) 347-0450 FOR MORE INFO: NRC Honors Excellence with Annual Awards September 9, 2002 (Austin, TX) - Margretta "Meg" Morris, president of the National Recycling Coalition (NRC), will announce the winners of the 2002 NRC Annual Awards during a ceremony on Monday, September 9, 2002 during the 21st Annual Congress & Exposition in Austin, Texas. Morris and NRC Awards Chairwoman Lori Gummow will present awards to eight national winners. The awards honor businesses, citizens, communities and schools for their outstanding waste reduction and recycling achievements. "The NRC Awards program recognizes the best of the best and demonstrates that recycling is alive and well," said Morris. "Being an NRC Award winner brings to light the tremendous achievements of individuals and organizations. The personal satisfaction of being so highly recognized by one's peers is something to which we all aspire," she said. The NRC Awards Program heightens the awareness of recycling programs
with city councils, boards of directors, citizens, businesses and
state agencies. "Our winners represent diverse and dynamic
recycling programs and practices that deserve attention and praise
from across the nation," said Gummow. The National Soft Drink Association is again this year presenting NRC Congress & Expo scholarships to college undergraduates engaged in course work related to natural resource management, recycling, or packaging and extracurricular activities related to recycling and solid waste management on their campuses. Scholarships include airfare, hotel accommodations, meals and a full Congress & Expo registration. This year's scholarship recipients are: Jordan Buckley (University of Texas); Camille Kustin (University of California, Davis); Lauren Permenter (University of Texas); Amy Sommer (University of Texas); and Taylor Stevenson (University of Oregon, Eugene). For more information about the National Soft Drink Association, please visit http://www.nsda.org. For more information about the National Recycling Coalition and the Annual Congress & Exposition, please visit http://www.nrc-recycle.org. The National Recycling Coalition is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement and improvement of recycling, and also source reduction, composting and reuse by providing technical information, education, training, outreach and advocacy services to its members in order to conserve resources and benefit the environment. |
Waterbury - Figures released by EPA show that Vermont continues to have the lowest level of toxic chemical releases in the nation. The annual Toxic Release Inventory (TRI), released this week, confirms that during the past 17 years of reporting, total releases have declined by nearly 98 percent overall in Vermont. Nationally, chemical releases have declined by nearly 68 percent. This has occurred even as more facilities and industrial sectors are required to report their emissions. "It is important to note that these figures are not for illegal
discharges", Commissioner for Environmental Conservation Jeff
Wennberg said. "They include emissions that occur as part of
day to day economic activity. "The Department of Environmental Conservation continues to work in partnership with Vermont Businesses on pollution prevention and reduction strategies." Vermont's pollution prevention program asks companies to evaluate opportunities to reduce their use of toxic chemicals by developing three-year pollution prevention plans. Companies are currently preparing their plans for the period July1/05 through July 1/08. During 2003, the latest year for which data are available, slightly more than 201,000 pounds of chemicals were released in Vermont - by far the lowest of all states in our region. Of Vermont's releases, approximately 32 percent were emitted to the air, and nearly 68 percent were emitted to water during 2003. Nationwide 23,811 facilities reported releasing 4.44 billion pounds
of the almost 650 toxic chemicals. Nitrate Compounds 2003 releases = 131,146 lbs. 2002 releases =
114,082 lbs. Justin Johnson at 802 241 3803 or email to justin.johnson@anr.state.vt.us |
For Immediate Release Materials Exchange FOR MORE INFO: Cryptic Title of What the Press Release is About Date (City Name) - A quick sentence to describe "who, what, when, and where" in regard to the event, information release, or program that is being touted to the press. Subsequent paragraphs should explain additional details. A rule of thumb is to write the paragraphs in the order of decreasing importance. Thus, during the editing process, the editor or journalist will capture the most important facts or ideas. Quotes from relevant parties are valued, along with catchy statistics (the highest, the lowest, the most, the first..., etc.). Try to include some educational emphasis that entails the mission of the Exchange (see paragraph below for an example of these points):
The final paragraph can be a brief description of your organization (see paragraph below for an example):
If letterhead is used for processing the Press Release, there is no need to reiterate the organization's name and address. It is a good idea to develop a template form for Press Releases and save it on your word processor, so as to save time when you want to get the Press Release out quickly. |
APPENDIX V: SUCCESS STORIES FOR MATERIALS EXCHANGES
Furnish a Future Exchange
Minwax®, Inc.
In celebration of its 100th Anniversary,
Minwax® teamed up with "Furnish A Future", a branch of The
Partnership for the Homeless in New York City. The organization provides
free furniture to families moving out of homeless shelters and into permanent
housing. Minwax® contributed by making a large furniture donation
and conducting a how-to workshop.
The event was part of Minwax®'s efforts to give back to the community through its Do Good With Wood campaign. It was a great success as evidenced by the enthusiasm of the workshop participants and the gratitude of the Furnish a Future staff. And, the event was covered by local media including The Daily News newspaper and ABC Eyewitness News television.
Each year, Minwax® creates beautiful furniture for TV commercials, print ads and custom publications. Over the past several years, the company accumulated a truckload of tables, chairs, dressers, and more. On June 15th, the furniture was taken out of storage and delivered to the Furnish A Future warehouse in Brooklyn, N.Y. Members of the Minwax® marketing team and Furnish a Future volunteers were there to lend a hand.
That same day, Minwax® expert Bruce Johnson, led a wood finishing workshop for the volunteers and some individuals who've been helped by The Partnership. He demonstrated how to touch up furniture that has scratches and other minor damage. Additionally, the group learned how to stain and finish wood. Minwax® provided unfinished oak chests that the class finished with Water-Based stains in a variety of decorator colors. When they were done, the students had brand-new dressers to take home.
The Hudson Valley Materials Exchange
Phillips Components, Saugerties, Ulster, NY
Phillips Components manufactures ferrite for telecommunications and
automotive applications to specifications and shipped out to customers.
Those that do not meet specifications are sent to the HVME. The materials
available from Phillips are manufacturing by-products and packing materials.
One material, called FINES POWDER, is used as an additive for Portland
cement. Other materials include shredded paper and sheets of cardboard
laminated to foam that is used for packing. Refractory materials of use
to potters are also available. These include bricks, Carborundum kiln
shelves and electric kilns.
Vulcan Northeast Loose-leaf, Saugerties, Ulster, NY
Northeast Loose-leaf manufactures custom loose-leaf binders with
vinyl, cloth or leather covers. The binders have cardboard cores and are
screen-printed or embossed with the customer's logo. Materials that Northeast
Loose-leaf offers are: 1/2 inch wide strips of book board trimmed from
large sheets, bales of vinyl strips trimmed from around the edges of the
completed binders (all colors), binder ring units which are separate from
the covers, and large sheets of heavy waterproof vinyl, both clear and
colored.
EG&G Rotron , Saugerties, Ulster, NY
Rotron makes blowers for moving air. Two of the applications for
these blowers are: to bubble air through water to keep it from freezing,
and to blow the skin off of duck carcasses for preparation of Peking duck!
The machines' moving parts are made from cast aluminum, but the machines
are still heavy enough that they must be bolted to a piece of chipboard
for shipping. This shipping material, as well as the box that covers the
motor casing, is part of the waste at Rotron. Each of these motors produces
heat when in use, so the outer housing is protected with 1-inch thick
fiberglass insulation. The circles of fiberglass that are punched out
to accommodate the fan are another waste product.
Simulaids , Woodstock, Ulster, NY
The motto at Simulaids is WE SAVE LIVES. This is a factory that makes
mannequins for safety and medical training. They are realistically molded
of vinyl. Some mannequins are used for drowning rescue training. These
are weighted with scraps of the same vinyl that forms the skin. If a mannequin
is flawed when removed from its mold, rather then throw it away, the vinyl
is put through a special grinder which produces pieces small enough to
pour into another mannequin to add weight. This accomplishes two objectives:
first, it provides the rescue worker with a realistic experience when
removing a weighted mannequin from the water, and second, it uses a waste
material on-site. Surplus chopped vinyl is occasionally available at the
Exchange. One of the styles of mannequin is for practicing cardiopulmonary
resuscitation. These are equipped with replaceable plastic bags that function
as the lungs. These plastic bags can sometimes be found at the HVME.
Woodstock Percussion , West Hurley, Ulster, NY
Woodstock Percussion makes wind chimes and percussion instruments.
Their most well-known product is a chime of aluminum tubing which hang
from wooden discs. The irregular discs of various sizes are at the HVME
warehouse. Each chime needs an object, called a feather, to catch the
wind and cause the chimes to ring. These feathers are also available at
the HVME. Some are plain wooden shapes and some are in the shapes of hummingbirds
or other decorative motifs for custom chimes. The decorative elements
arrive individually packed in rice paper boxes from China, which are then
sent to the HVME. Wooden parts are coated in varnish and tumbled in a
medium of wooden bits which, when thickly coated in varnish, are unusable.
These smooth, shiny small wooden shapes are sent by the barrelful to the
warehouse.
Stucki Embroidery, Boiceville, Ulster, NY
Stucki Embroidery manufactures iron-on patches, emblems, and embroidered
yard goods such as the stars that go onto American flags. All of these
involve the stitching of enormous amounts of thread onto a background
fabric. As a result, Stucki accumulates large amounts of cardboard cones
that hold thread and cardboard cores that come inside bolts of cloth.
These are available at HVME. Lengths of fabric that do not reach the 15-yard
length of the embroidery machines are not used and are sent to the Exchange
as well. Some of this is flag material, blue with white stars; some is
plain, and the rest is variously colored with intricate patterns. The
last material that Stucki offers is a product of the embroidery technology.
A roll of heavy punched paper, similar to the rolls that operate a player
piano guides the machines. As the holes are punched they drop into a bin
resulting in a green, confetti-type material.
Emsig Buttons, Hudson, Ulster, NY
Across from the landfill in Hudson, New York, is the Emsig Button
Factory, the largest button manufacturer in the United States. Emsig has
been making polyester resin buttons since the 1940's, specializing in
imitation pearl buttons. These buttons are formed with several layers
of smooth color which allow light to pass through in different amounts,
and the result looks like the button has been cut from the inner side
of a shell. Imitation pearl buttons contained lead until the 1960's when
the founder, Mr. Emsig, developed a lead-free process. All Emsig buttons
are inspected twice before being sold to clothing manufacturers and buttons
that do not pass inspection are trucked to HVME. Emsig produces 60 cubic
yards of waste per week.
Alcar, Newburgh, Orange, NJ
Alcar manufactures twist tie wire. The Exchange collects the surplus
twist tie wire, coated and uncoated, as well as the off-cut plastic coating
for the wire which comes in a variety of bright colors.
Dyno Nobel,Port Ewen, Ulster, NY
This company manufactures fireworks and explosives. Their rubber
hose (surplus detonator) and cardboard sliding cylinders are two materials
donated by this company.
Shapiros Coffee Roasters, Pleasant Valley, Dutchess, NY
The Exchange takes a percentage of the burlap bags that the coffee
beans are shipped in.
Newburgh Yarn Mills, Newburgh, Orange, NY
Run by the Drennan Family for over 60 years, the Newburgh Yarn Mills
closed shop in 1998. Located on Broadway across from the famous Strooks
clothing store, when they closed the factory, the building was demolished.
The Exchange removed a thousand each of leather bobbins and antique wooden
spools (which were removed directly from the ancient spinning machines).
Also collected were a tractor-trailer load of yarn, carts and antique
wooded conveyor belts.
The Maine Materials Exchange:
Erda, Inc.
Erda is a small manufacturing company in central Maine, specializing
in deerskin handbags, with a minor business in recycled products. For
years, people suggested to Erda that the bags would look best stuffed
with soft plastic bags, but Erda was unwilling to use new plastic that
way. Then they discovered that Guilford Industries had lots of plastic
bags that needed a home. Erda bought a truckload of the plastic bags,
and found the plastic did indeed make the handbags look great. Fortunately
for the environment (but unfortunately for Erda), Guilford has begun to
re-use their plastic bags, so Erda needed to find another source. One
source was located, but it is in New York State, so shipping is going
to be cost-prohibitive. Erda receives quarterly lists from the Industrial
Materials Exchange (IMEX) in Seattle and finds that seeing what others
are discarding is a way to find inspiration to create products using the
by-products of other manufacturers higher up in the food chain. Shipping
costs all the way across the country made it prohibitive, though. Recently
Erda saw some closed-cell foam rubber gasket material that intrigued me,
and came up with an idea to use it and some used clothing at the local
Goodwill to make journal covers. The pockets of the used jeans are very
useful for holding pencils, pens, calculators, candy bars, glasses, cell
phones! The gasket material is sticky on one side, making it ideal to
attach the jeans.
Materials for the Arts
Ellen Stewart, Artistic Director/Founder, La MaMa E.T.C.
"We appreciate every bit of your contributions toward our survival.
Your gifts, your energy, your love enable us to be."
Kathleeen Laziza, Director, The Micro Museum PAWI/ Promote Art Works,
Inc.
"The Museum estimates that MFTA contributes 40% to our annual
art production and educational programs, and is one of the reasons we
have decided to stay in NYC. Artists are served immeasurably for easy
access to quality materials, the public is enchanted by the results of
that artistic work, and NYC's environment is healthier for everyone. Keep
up the good work! We love MFTA!"
Rome Neal, Artistic Director, Nuyorican Poets Cafe
"Materials for the Arts is a godsend. One of the cities true
treasures in more ways than one."
Tom Finklepearl, Director, Queens Museum of Art
"MFTA is a huge resource. Their move (to Long Island City) will
benefit all the organizations here and they are helping to break the psychological
barrier that art only thrives in Manhattan."
Per Scholas Materials Exchange:
Norwalk Community College's Recycle Program Helps to Close the
Digital Divide
The Advocate, August 2001
Incoming freshman at NCC have the opportunity to buy a computer refurbished
by technicians at Per Scholas. Having a computer at home makes a student's
life much easier." This is for anyone left behind the computer revolution,"
said Peter Beutel, lab spokesperson from the college's Center for Information
Technology, touting the capabilities of the refurbished computers. This
program was the recipient of the 2001 Governor's Waste Reduction and Recycling
Program Innovation Award.
This award recognizes the efforts of effective businesses, nonprofit organizations,
municipalities, environmental groups, and individuals who reduce solid
waste through their use of source reduction, reuse or recycling programs.
Rhode Island ResourceXchange
Sherwin Williams Paint Co.
The Sherwin Williams Paint Company is contributing large quantities
of discontinued or outdated paint cans to be made available to non-profit
users.
Bryant University
Bryant University has transferred three dormitory's worth of furnishings
to a non-profit organization (Hope of Life/Food for the Poor) that will
distribute the materials to orphanages in Nicaragua, San Salvador, and
Guatemala. This exchange follows other such arrangements with Hope of
Life, and the Rhode Island Community Crusade for Children, to send 40,000
pounds of toys, bicycles, old hospital beds, crutches, wheelchairs, household
goods, pain, farming materials and clothing.
DeWal Industries
DeWal Industries, a manufacture of polymer films and pressure sensitive
tapes, has exchanged 500 20-gallon white barrels to be shipped to Central
America as infant bathtubs.
Storehouse NY:
Carolyn Young knew the heartache of having to choose between paying
the utility bill or buying clothes for her children. "I felt hopeless,"
she says. But now Carolyn smiles as she thanks her friend and mentor,
Shirley Johnson, who distributes clothes, personal care items, and household
goods from The Storehouse of World Vision to help struggling mothers like
Carolyn get back on their feet. "My troubles are over," says
Carolyn.
APPENDIX VI: OTHER EXCHANGES AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION
The following organizations, reports, and Websites have been included because they represent good sources of information, share the same community base, provide good models for different types of Exchange programs, or are indirectly connected to the Northeast Exchanges in some way. The information was gathered in the course of research for preparing this marketing report.APPENDIX VII: TEMPLATES FOR INTERNSHIP DESCRIPTIONS
The following descriptions of internships, derived from different sources, provide templates that could be utilized by Exchanges in requesting interns from academic institutions or from specialized web sites, such as the Environmental Careers Organization (ECO). Exchanges could utilize the ECO guidelines for descriptions of internships (Sponsor, Description, Specific Tasks, Qualifications, Terms, and Contact). Each printout includes the web site URL for easy access.
Additional web sites that are designed to match interns with internship opportunities include the following options. Most of these interactive web sites provide free services for non-profit organizations, some are free for students, and some of the listing services have a fee attached.
| Web Site & Internet Address | Description of Features |
Environmental Careers Organization |
Provides a large and diverse listing of internships for students in the environmental field; registration capability for employers with internships |
InternshipPrograms.com |
Provides a large and diverse listing of internships for students in the environmental field; free listing capability for employers with internships |
U.S. Interns.com |
Provides listing of relevant web sites providing choices of internships |
Snag-A-Job.com |
Enables students to apply for internships (as well as part-time and hourly work, and management trainee positions) |
Upspiral.com |
Provides extensive listing of web sites providing choices of internships |
Paidinterns.com |
Allows registration by students and by employers listing internships; also provides links to other web sites listing internships |
Rising Star Internships |
Provides resources for students, graduates, and employers; good model for required information in description of an internship ("Internship Form") |
Search results will
open in a new window