500 Million Each Day

February 20, 2018

February 20, 2018


The only time I use a straw is on summer days, when I’m sitting outside and enjoying a cool beverage in my lidded tumbler. It’s a metal straw and necessary for protecting my beverage from being spilled by Angus the dog’s dangerous wagging tail. I understand that children, the elderly, and ill people may have to use straws to aid in sipping liquids. For the rest of us, however, it’s way past time we consider “Just saying NO” to the unnecessary disposable plastic straw!


It is speculated that drinking straws were developed to serve as a sieve, filtering out solids from the liquids being consumed. Straws are also marketed for sanitary reasons, to reduce the risk of spreading germs from improperly washed glassware. However, like much of our waste, they have since become more of a cultural phenomenon.


According to Wikipedia, the Sumerians used straws for drinking beer, possibly to avoid the distasteful solid byproducts of fermentation that ended up at the bottom of the container. These and other early straws were made of metal. For centuries, Argentines have used metal straws for drinking mate tea. Rye grass straws were popular in the 1800s, despite their tendency to turn into mush in liquid and leaving a “grassy” taste. Again, according to Wikipedia, one Marvin C. Stone set about to address this shortcoming; in 1888, he patented the modern drinking straw, manufactured from paper.


Today, most drinking straws are made from polypropylene plastic. According to EcoCycle’s Be Straw Free Campaign, 500 million plastic straws (equal to nearly 3 million pounds!) are used and disposed in our country each day. This amounts to an average of 1.6 straws per capita per day. Due to their size (they are incompatible with recycling processing equipment) and lack of market demand for polypropylene from straws, they are not recyclable and often end up as litter. Plastic straws are one of the most common litter item found during beach clean-ups.


Straws are ubiquitous, but it seems that most people don’t even consider the impact of the “little” plastic tube. Order almost any cold to-go beverage and it will come with a straw. Sit down in a restaurant, and your water will almost always come with a straw already in the glass. Fortunately, there is growing awareness of the impact of straws and other disposable plastics on our waterways and oceans. We’ve all seen videos of plastic straws and similar items found in sea turtles and other marine animals.


A straws-on-request movement is slowly gaining ground in some parts of the country, most notably in California. The cities of Davis and San Luis Obispo have adopted ordinances requiring that restaurants, bars and cafes have patrons request single-use plastic straws for their drinks, instead of receiving them automatically. Plastic straws in self-service bins are still allowed in these “consumer’s choice” ordinances. Other California communities, including Encinitas, a San Diego County beach town, and Berkeley are also considering similar “straw-reduction” ordinances. Seattle recently announced that as of July, 2018, it will become the largest metropolitan city to ban the single-use plastic straw (compostable or recyclable options are okay). Ahead of the ban, restaurants and other businesses around the City are participating in the Strawless In Seattle campaign.


Of course, not everyone wants to see more ordinances. But if each of us takes it upon themselves to just say “no straw please” when we order cold liquids, this would help to reduce the number of discarded straws. Urging restaurants and other food service providers to adopt a “straws-on-request” policy is another easy tactic. This simple act can make a big difference without limiting those who still want a straw, and its sets a model for customers and other food service providers. Furthermore, those of us in the materials management field know that straws are a common contaminant in recycling and food waste diversion programs; thus, straw reduction policies can be marketed as a green policy undertaking.


Friday, February 24 is National Skip the Straw Day. Consider taking that first step to reduce your straw use. If you are already on the “skip the straw” path, please share this blog and the announcement about National Straw Day. For those who work with food service providers, add the “straws-on-request” policy to your outreach campaigns.


If you still want a straw, there are plenty of reusable alternatives on the market. Just like carrying your own refillable mug or tumbler, reusable straws present a practical compromise. Check out 5 eco-friendly alternatives to plastic straws for a great article about reusable alternatives, including bamboo, metal, glass, and silicone straws. There are also a growing number of paper and compostable straw food service ware providers.


By Athena Lee Bradley

Share Post

By Sophie Leone • November 4, 2026
What We Learned in Princeton
By Keith Loria | Resource Recycling • October 30, 2026
Recycled commodity values at Northeast MRFs increased for the second consecutive quarter as Q2 2026 figures show gains across most materials outweighed a 61% drop in PET, according to the Northeast Recycling Council. In the latest report, average blended values reached $93.03/ton without residuals, up 11.1% from Q1. Including residuals, the value climbed 15.24% to $76.37/ton, NERC said. The gains extended a recovery from Q4 2025, when average values fell to five-year lows of $68.41/ton without residuals and $52.49/ton with them. Values rebounded 22.37% and 26.26%, respectively, in Q1 2026 , though the latest increases came at a slower pace. That late-2025 trough followed declines in OCC, mixed paper, aluminum cans and several plastics grades. Natural and color HDPE were among the exceptions, posting gains during Q4. The new results therefore show a broader recovery in commodity pricing, though PET has continued moving lower through the first half of 2026. PET averaged $40.48/ton in Q2, with reported prices ranging from $8.47 to $70. The resin also declined in Q1, when most other commodities began recovering. Other plastics posted substantial increases. Color HDPE rose 122% to $293.63/ton, while natural HDPE increased 10% to $1,471.31/ton. Polypropylene climbed 72% to $345.37/ton, and mixed plastics Nos. 3-7 advanced 39% to $186.52/ton. OCC increased 17% to $99.21/ton, while mixed paper fell 5% to $45.57/ton. Aluminum cans gained 5% to $2,171.29/ton, and steel cans rose 4% to $221.29/ton. Glass remained mixed. Clear and green container prices declined, brown glass held steady, and three-mix glass carried a negative average value of $37.71/ton, meaning MRFs paid to move the material. The quarterly survey collected commodity pricing from 19 MRFs across 12 states. Two facilities were excluded from the blended average because they marketed insufficient material during Q2 to provide a representative comparison. That calculation included 13 single-stream and four dual-stream or source-separated facilities. Single-stream values rose 12.3% to $91.28/ton without residuals and 11.37% to $74.74/ton with residuals. Dual-stream and source-separated values increased 8.04% to $98.65/ton without residuals and 28.33% to $81.62/ton with residuals, remaining above single-stream values on both measures. Residuals are incoming materials that cannot be marketed and require disposal. The measure without residuals reflects a ton of marketed recyclables; the measure including residuals accounts for managing unmarketable material in each ton processed. Disposal costs increased during Q2, although facilities may calculate those costs differently, NERC noted. The report covers Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Virginia. Collection systems and state policies affect which materials reach participating facilities. Beverage container deposit programs, for example, divert some glass bottles, PET bottles and aluminum cans away from MRFs, reducing potential revenue from those materials. Single-stream collection remains the most common approach represented in the survey. NERC cautioned that differences in collection programs, market access and operating conditions limit how the regional averages can be applied locally. “This data is not intended to serve as a price guide for MRF contracts,” the organization said. Read on Resource Recycling.
By Megan Fontes • October 29, 2026
NERC’s Material Recovery Facilities (MRF) Commodity Values Survey Report for April – June 2026 reflects the continuing rise of commodity values across the Northeast after several quarters of decline. Dual stream/source-separated MRFs continued to report higher average commodity values than single stream MRFs. The average blended commodity value increased by 11.1% to $93.03 per ton without residuals and by 15.24% to $76.37 per ton with residuals in Q2 2026 compared to Q1 2026. Single stream values increased by 12.3% to $91.28 per ton without residuals and by 11.37% to $74.74 per ton with residuals. Dual stream values increased by 8.04% to $98.65 per ton without residuals and by 28.33% to $81.62 per ton with residuals.