From Waste to Worth: Highlights from the Rethink Resource Use Conference

Angelina Ruiz • November 7, 2025

The Northeast Recycling Council (NERC) held their annual event from October 7 – 8 in Boston, MA. Renamed the Rethink Resource Use Conference, the name reflects an update in the approach of managing materials and discussing key strategies to drive sustainable practices forward in communities. “The new name, Rethink Resource Use, makes us consider how we can leave a more positive impact. NERC brings together professionals from across the materials management chain to improve management practices and ensure the health of the people and the environment. The event aims to mobilize others to take action and engage people in recycling programs, community engagement, trends, and more,” said NERC’s Executive Director, Megan Schulz-Fontes. Gathering together leaders from academia, government, and the sustainable materials industry, the conference was a great way to reconnect through networking and learning opportunities.


RRU DAY ONE

Material Shifts and New Terrain


On Tuesday morning, October 7, Schulz-Fontes welcomed attendees to Boston and expressed that she was looking forward to having meaningful discussions and making connections with people around the industry. With great speakers from across the world, a wide range of important topics would be covered from innovations in infrastructure to technology. She also thanked talented colleagues who evaluated this event and made it even better, welcomed emerging professionals, and emphasized that it is important to acknowledge that human practices are shifting and evolving, and new programs and regulations are coming online to address the growing waste problem. We need to safeguard public health and biodiversity to help life on earth.


Schulz-Fontes then introduced John Fischer, Deputy Division Director for Solid Waste Materials Management for the Massachusetts’ Department of Environmental Protection, who made the opening remarks, reflecting on Massachusetts’ Solid Waste master plan. He pointed out that they set an aggressive reduction goal—to reduce 1.7 tons of waste by 2030. While they have seen progress in certain areas, waste has continued to rise. So, they are reviewing it now to see how they can shift elements for greater progress. Massachusetts has been successful in food waste reduction (from small businesses and residents) with a waste disposal ban and recycling market grants, as well as loans to try to build the infrastructure. He said they have also seen success in their mattress disposal ban and an increase in textile recovery since implementation in 2022. There is also a long-standing disposal ban on construction waste to ensure more effective separation. In 2020, diversion was at 15% and increased to 20% in 2025. They would like to get to 30% by 2030. Fischer also pointed out that the Massachusetts DEP needs to take a comprehensive approach and grow market funding. They have collaborated with state and local health officials to create best practices with food containers and replace single waste food service ware to reusables. There are growing suites of market recycling program grants, including market reduction innovation grants launched this year. Smaller and more flexible grants could grow waste diversion over time and help facilities grow at scale. He said that while they are looking at doing the best they can to manage waste, the goal is to learn from colleagues in other states and in the business communities.


David Allaway, Senior Policy Analyst, from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, gave the keynote address, first pointing out that about 20 years ago, they started taking a deeper look at their solid waste and recycling program and the connection with the waste and climate situation. Because of that, it caused a shift in programming. Going back to 2004, the Department was tasked with looking at solid waste management opportunities—recycling and waste prevention was primarily reducing in other states but not Oregon. The community was ready for climate protection, but emissions reductions don’t count. That was the beginning of Oregon’s Consumption-Based Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory (CBEI) and the results were an eye opener and the inventory has been updated since to look at current trends. The key takeaways from this was that all studies point in the same direction—materials matter! The production and use of materials does have a profound impact on our environment. Most impacts occur upstream of use and disposal. Recycling and composting can be helpful but alone are insufficient. From this, Oregon’s 2050 Vision and Framework for Action was born. This also included end of life materials. Allaway explained that the legislative report and technical supports were published last fall. For Oregon:

  • Materials are driving growth in emissions
  • Most emissions occur pre-purchase (most in food and vehicles and parts)
  • Sector based emissions have flattened while consumption-based emissions have grown
  • Emissions are out of state but not out of reach


Oregon Comprehensive Climate Action Plan (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Solid Waste Management) includes:

  1. Landfill methane reductions
  2. Recycling improvements
  3. Expand composting
  4. Prevent wasting of food
  5. Plant-rich diets
  6. Upstream packaging EPR
  7. Reduce embodies carbon


He pointed out that not all materials are equally beneficial to recycling, and not all recycling pathways are equally beneficial. Maximizing recycling is not the same as optimizing recycling. Lifecycle impacts versus material attributes begs the question; how well do popular material attributes correlate with reduced environmental impacts? When comparing different packages based on recyclability, recyclable packages are better for the environment, however, downstream impacts must be taken into consideration. Recycling and composting are a means to an end—the conservation of resources and reduction of pollution, however, not all are effective. Design your programs to maximize them instead of just chasing tonnage diversion targets. Is education effective? It depends on how recycling is communicated and how local authorities think about it and treat it. Whether it is advanced through policy through broader benefits, it depends on you and what choices you make and the paths take in the coming years.


Discussions on EPR

After the welcome remarks and morning keynote, focus turned to “EPR for Packaging State of Mind: Lessons and Progress in the Northeast” Moderated by Kevin Budris, Deputy Director for Just Zero, the discussion featured Jason Bergquist, Vice President of U.S. Operations for RecycleMe; Erin Victor, PhD, Member of the Senator George J Mitchell Center Research Team at the University of Maine; Shannon McDonald, Natural Resource Planner at the Maryland Department of the Environment; and David Allaway, Senior Policy Analyst for Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.


Bergquist kicked it off by talking about the current EPR landscape in the U.S. Seven EPR packaging bills have been passed and 10 states have introduced legislation for EPR for packaging from 2024 to 2025; this number continues to rise. Those that have been signed into law include Oregon and Maine (2021), Colorado and California (2022), Minnesota (2024), and Washington and Maryland (2025), with implementation ranging from July 2025 to July 2029. California has the most ambitious goals—by 2032 100% of all packaging must be recyclable or compostable, 65% of all single-use plastic packaging to be recycled, and there should be a 25% reduction in packaging. He said that challenges producers face in the west are when is a producer a producer, when is a package a package, where should the focus be (fees, targets, modulation plans). There are always different definitions, two different scopes, bottle bill vs non-bottle bill, primary, secondary, tertiary—which is in scope?


Victor covered the research she’s been doing the past couple of years. Her research approach included a qualitative case study of the emergence of Maine’s EPR for packaging legislation situated within a larger 24-month ethnographic research project on the politics of disposable packaging. Maine is a primarily rural state and much of it relies on drop off centers. However, the state has yet to meet the 50% waste diversion goal, so something more needs to be done. She did explain that there have been disruptions to Maine’s materials management system that have been a challenge: centralized waste planning agencies disbanded, Green Fence/National Sword, COVID, and the shuttering of the Coastal Resource of Maine facility in Hampden. Maine’s packaging journey started in 2019 when the DEP recommended EPR for packaging. In 2021, the state passed the first in the nation EPR law, the rules were adopted in 2024, and in 2025, the goal is to define ‘readily recyclable’ and selecting a stewardship organization. She emphasized that it is critical to have a strong commitment to stakeholder outreach, maintain municipal operational control over materials management, look at the need for more transparent and robust data and the burden of reporting (for both producers and municipalities), and consider what elements of packaging regulation to address through market-based approaches versus command-and-control regulations. Fortunately, LD1423 was introduced this year which really updated and harmonized the program. She said that she is currently working on estimating the impact of tradeoffs in U.S. EPR rulemaking scenarios.


Read the full article on Waste Advantage.

Share Post

By Brian Shane | OC Today-Dispatch April 30, 2026
(May 1, 2026) Worcester County collected millions more pounds of recycling last year, but generated less revenue – and taxpayers are covering the difference. The shift reflects a sharp drop in the market for recyclable materials, which has undercut what the county can earn from selling paper, plastic and metal. County officials say they sometimes hold materials for weeks or months, waiting for a buyer, Public Works Director Dallas Baker told the county commissioners. “Cardboard still sells really well. Metals sell really well. Plastic is kind of horrible,” he said at an April 14 budget work session. “For most of the year, plastic might not sell at all – like, you have to pay somebody to come take your plastic.” The county is projecting $150,000 in recycling revenue for fiscal year 2027, against more than $1.2 million in costs – a shortfall absorbed by the county’s general fund, according to Enterprise Fund Controller Quinn Dittrich. He added that recycling revenue has declined in the last two fiscal years, falling about $80,000 in 2024 and $15,000 in 2025. Low prices for plastics are driving the decline, according to Bob Keenan, the county’s recycling manager. Vendors are offering just a few cents per pound for plastic. “There is simply no market in it,” he said. “There are warehouses and warehouses of plastic that (vendors) can’t get anybody to buy.” Other materials have also lost value, Keenan said: Corrugated cardboard has fallen from $125 a ton to as low as $60. Mixed paper has dropped from $120 a ton to $70. Aluminum sells for $1.09 by the ton through a broker, though market prices are closer to 80 cents. At the same time, recycling volume is up. Last year, the county collected 1,985 more tons of recyclables – that’s almost 4 million pounds – than in 2024. Totals for 2025 came to 12,236 tons for residential recyclables and 24,707 for commercial, according to Keenan. He noted that the county has been promoting recycling through outreach, in part by hosting 14 school field trips in the last year to its Newark processing facility. “We send them home with a lot of literature about what you can and can’t recycle,” Keenan said. “I want people to know what we do, and that we’re not throwing their recycling away.” Worcester’s revenue decline mirrors a broader trend. A March 2026 report from the Northeast Recycling Council found recycling commodity values hit a five-year low in 12 states, including Maryland and Delaware. Industry reports also show at least five U.S. plastic recycling facilities have closed since early 2025 as demand has weakened. Ocean City officials faced a similar reality years ago. The resort pulled the plug on its traditional recycling program in 2009 after determining it was too costly to maintain. In its final year, the city spent $1.2 million on recycling and brought in $200,000 in revenue, according to Public Works Director Hal Adkins. Since then, Ocean City has contracted to truck its rubbish to waste-to-energy incinerators outside Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. “It was just not sustainable,” Adkins said. “It doesn’t make money.” Read on OC Today-Dispatch.
By Cole Rosengren | WasteDrive April 29, 2026
A combination of EPA and USDA funding has resulted in numerous changes throughout the city, including free commercial recycling service, residential recycling carts and organics infrastructure. Providence, Rhode Island, is starting to see tangible results from multiple organics and recycling programs funded by federal grants. This work was spurred by $3.34 million from the U.S. EPA’s Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling grant program awarded in 2023, as well as $255,850 from a U.S. Department of Agriculture grant awarded in 2024. Now, multiple years in, the city has funded new vehicles, carts and other infrastructure. Back in November 2023, Mayor Brett Smiley described the EPA funding as a big opportunity to advance sustainability efforts. “By helping divert food waste, in particular, from the waste stream we can extend the life of our Central Landfill, but also help meet our climate justice goals,” he said at a November 2023 Northeast Recycling Council event. Smiley noted this would also help address recycling issues. “We know that we’ve got a major education gap to fill with residents and business owners. The recycling rates in the city of Providence are quite low [and] there’s a very clear equity gap in terms of which neighborhoods recycle and how.” Commercial recycling One unique aspect of Providence’s grant-funded programs is free commercial recycling service, which is still coming to fruition. In his NERC speech, Mayor Smiley noted this idea was driven in part by “a problem with overflowing dumpsters” that “degrades the quality of life” in certain commercial areas with a lot of restaurants. The SWIFR grant, which has funding until January 2027, helped fund the purchase of a rearload recycling collection truck for approximately $200,000. This truck is run by the city’s Department of Public Works and initially focused on offering free service in two neighborhoods. Federal Hill and the West End were chosen for their high density and proliferation of restaurants. Participants can receive two to three carts, which will be collected twice per week. The Center for EcoTechnology is helping manage the outreach and technical assistance for this as well as a separate technical assistance program for commercial organics. Kevin Proft, Providence’s deputy director of sustainability, said in a recent interview there was a long lead time to procure the truck and progress has been slower than hoped. The city’s goal was to recruit up to 75 businesses, but so far about 10 had signed on as of early April. This is yielding an estimated half a ton to 1 ton per week. “Surprisingly, we haven’t been able to get businesses to jump at the opportunity as easily as we thought we would,” said Proft, adding the pitch is “it could potentially reduce your hauling costs by reducing the amount of waste in your dumpster.” Lorenzo Macaluso, chief growth officer for CET, said his team is working to create testimonials of participating businesses and plans to continue expanding outreach. The city is also looking at potentially expanding the program to include other neighborhoods. “Sometimes selling a free thing is harder than you think ... what we find is decision makers often need to hear things more than once,” he said. Macaluso also noted some businesses may feel recycling creates extra work, even when technical assistance is available to help with bin setup and signage. “So we’re trying to compress that learning curve as much as possible and give them those tools, but that perception is hard to overcome.” Residential recycling Providence has an estimated 2.4% recycling rate and 47% contamination rate , despite prior goals to reach 30% by 2020 as well as “eliminate contaminated recycling” by 2030 . The city recently began rolling out 55,000 new curbside recycling carts , along with an updated citywide education campaign, in an effort to reverse these trends. This came together with $1.8 million of EPA SWIFR funding, $625,000 from The Recycling Partnership and $5 million in financing from Closed Loop Partners’ Catalytic Capital & Private Credit Group. That latter commitment was backed by American Beverage’s Every Bottle Back initiative. The carts align with a new curbside collection contract awarded to WM last summer. That contract included an amendment stipulating the company pay $50,000 for recycling education in the first year and offer services at that value in the following years. A WM spokesperson confirmed that education funding is managed by the city. Another new aspect of this contract was the inclusion of WM’s Smart Truck camera technology in collection vehicles. This allows for targeted contamination monitoring and education feedback. Keefe Harrison, CEO of The Recycling Partnership, said during a recent interview this would allow for more targeted education efforts and reduce some of the need for manual cart checks or tagging. “We will be able to use cameras in the trucks to identify households that are doing a great job recycling versus the ones that are having a harder time, and then target those ‘oops’ tags for the ones that are having the harder time.” WM confirmed this is the first deployment of its technology in New England, following prior launches in other parts of the country . Proft said data reliability has been inconsistent for certain routes, but was optimistic about its long-term potential. “The sensors are a little bit sensitive and they’ve been breaking ... there seems to be a myriad reasons that we’re struggling to really get that running smoothly,” he said, while noting that “even the data we’re getting now is useful based on the capacity.” “WM is happy to be deploying this new technology in the City of Providence. With any new program there will be an implementation period, but we are pleased with the process so far and are excited about its future,” said Garrett Trierweiler, a regional director of public affairs for WM, via email. Organics In 2019, the city set a goal to “eliminate food waste” by 2040 . The recent federal funding has been used to help boost processing infrastructure, collection and education. Providence dedicated approximately $200,000 of SWIFR funding to support Groundwork Rhode Island’s West End Compost Hub. The site, an in-vessel composting project, is currently under construction and could open later this summer, according to Groundwork. USDA funding also helped cover five new organics drop-off sites managed by Groundwork, raising its total network to 16 sites . On the commercial side, SWIFR funding helped purchase two trucks for Remix Organics, a hauler in the city. This included a unique vacuum truck to collect brewery wastewater, which had become a concern for state regulators due to how it was previously managed. “They had more more customers asking for their service than they could service,” said Proft, describing this as an opportunity to “help our local economy by supporting this local business and also diverting more food waste from the landfill through these big chunks of commercial businesses.” Additionally, USDA funding covered a contract for CET to conduct outreach and education to businesses about organics recycling. This helped line up customers with vendors such as Remix and start collection service at a notable new location, the Rhode Island Convention Center. Other areas covered by the USDA grant included education that led an estimated 350 new households to participate in subscription pickups or free dropoff sites, as well as mentorship for setting up backyard composting at about 60 households. The grant also helped the Rhode Island School Recycling project set up food recovery and organics recycling at multiple elementary schools. Read article on Waste Dive.
By Marissa Heffernan | Packaging Dive April 21, 2026
The Northeast Recycling Council’s PCR Material Demand Hub centralizes resources to help packaging developers and buyers. Dive Brief: The Northeast Recycling Council launched a PCR Material Demand Hub to help companies, whether they make packaging or just purchase it, tap into domestic recycled content markets. The hub includes information on numerous materials commonly used in packaging, including paper, plastic and aluminum. While the main focus is recycled content, there’s also information on waste diversion, reuse, carbon impacts and other life cycle assessment variables. NERC hopes to add to it in the future, including resources for creating contracts. For those newer to PCR purchasing, the hub has a road map for getting started, as well as a Q&A on how to identify and buy plastic products with PCR. The hub draws on work from the Association of Plastic Recyclers in that area. Dive Insight: Companies and organizations looking to buy postconsumer recycled content and help shore up faltering domestic recycling markets have a new place to go for support. The Northeast Recycling Council launched the PCR Material Demand Hub to help counteract the recent strain on recycling markets as some brands loosen recycled content goals and resin imports surge . Megan Schulz-Fontes, executive director of the Northeast Recycling Council, said it’s the latest iteration of past programs. “We wanted to create a hub which pools all the resources that NERC had developed historically, as well as new ones that have come about since, to make it easier for organizations, whether they’re private or public, to purchase sustainable materials,” she said. In the past, NERC had worked with APR on the Government Recycling Demand Champions Program, which focused on getting governments, nonprofits and academic institutions to buy recycled materials. By 2022, activity in that program had started to lapse, Schulz-Fontes said. “We had done a lot of outreach. It was my impression that it wasn’t a need as much anymore, because those organizations had established sustainable procurement programs,” she said. However, markets shifted, most notably for PET, and today, we all “see and feel the impacts of processor closures due to the cheaper imports coming in and the chronic oversupply of virgin,” Schulz-Fontes said. There was a need again. As APR relaunched and redesigned the Recycling Demand Champions program and the National Stewardship Action Council started its “Remade in America” pledge, Schulz-Fontes said NERC wanted to support those programs and also reinvigorate some of its own. The Demand Champions Program suggests that organizations commit to PCR use, establish long-term supply agreements and think outside the box by using PCR in non-standard formats. To support those goals, the hub has a directory of manufacturers, vendors and suppliers of a variety of products with recycled content, as well as a Recycled Content and Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Directory with all levels of governmental resources, purchasing specifications and certification standards. That Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Directory is based on work that former NERC Executive Director Lynn Rubinstein did to develop an environmentally preferable purchasing specifications document, which is helpful for those who are just getting started, Schulz-Fontes said. In addition, the hub will link procurement professionals and others working in adjacent roles via an Environmentally Preferable Purchasing Network listserv called EPPnet. That’s also one of NERC’s older programs that needed new life breathed into it, Schulz-Fontes said. “We’re hoping that’s something that’s useful for folks,” she said. Anyone who is working directly on procurement is welcome to reach out to be added to the group. Other directories that NERC’s hub link to are the EcoPaper Database; Intertek’s Sustainability Certification Directory; the Electronic Product Assessment Tool; SCS Global Services Certified Green Products Guide; EPA’s CPG Product Supplier Directory; and APR’s Buyers and Sellers Directory. Read the article on Packaging Dive.